RE: IDS on VPN-GW
From: Keith T. Morgan (keith.morgan@terradon.com)
Date: 12/02/02
- Previous message: Matt Foster: "RE: Snort Monitoring"
- Next in thread: Rob Shein: "RE: IDS on VPN-GW"
- Reply: Rob Shein: "RE: IDS on VPN-GW"
- Maybe reply: counter.spy@gmx.de: "RE: IDS on VPN-GW"
- Maybe reply: Keith T. Morgan: "RE: IDS on VPN-GW"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 10:04:54 -0500 From: "Keith T. Morgan" <keith.morgan@terradon.com> To: <counter.spy@gmx.de>
We've deployed this scenario on Linux + Free S/Wan running snort on all physical interfaces and all ipsecX interfaces for folks. The fastest wire-speed we've had on one of these deployments is T1, and a PIII450 has handled VPN traffic at wirespeed even with the added load of snort. Sorry I don't have any higher-bandwidth benchmarks for you.
-----Original Message-----
From: counter.spy@gmx.de [mailto:counter.spy@gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 4:20 AM
To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com
Subject: IDS on VPN-GW
Hi folks,
I have recently tested snort on a vpn-gateway that runs on linux (just for
testing purposes, no productive server).
- Next message: Rob Shein: "RE: IDS on VPN-GW"
- Previous message: Matt Foster: "RE: Snort Monitoring"
- Next in thread: Rob Shein: "RE: IDS on VPN-GW"
- Reply: Rob Shein: "RE: IDS on VPN-GW"
- Maybe reply: counter.spy@gmx.de: "RE: IDS on VPN-GW"
- Maybe reply: Keith T. Morgan: "RE: IDS on VPN-GW"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|