Re: Snort Monitoring
From: Tony Scalzitti (tony@scalzitti.org)Date: 10/29/02
- Previous message: Aaron Turner: "Re: Changes in IDS Companies?"
- In reply to: Benjamin Keller: "Re: Snort Monitoring"
- Next in thread: Todd Holloway: "Re: Snort Monitoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Tony Scalzitti" <tony@scalzitti.org> To: "Benjamin Keller" <benjamin@conceptis.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:40:40 -0500
Yes demarc is nice, however it is not under GPL and has a high cost to it.
I just think that should be noted, as it does not exactly fit the Snort
mindset.
-T
----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin Keller" <benjamin@conceptis.com>
To: "Scott M. Algatt" <salgatt@turtleshell.net>
Cc: <focus-ids@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Snort Monitoring
> By far the best solution:
>
> http://www.demarc.com/products/puresecure/
>
> Hope it helps,
>
> Benjamin Keller
> Systems Administrator
> Conceptis Technologies
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Scott M. Algatt wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I am looking for something that will provide monitoring of snort for me.
> > I have several remote installs of Snort 1.9 and need to find a way to
> > monitor them to make sure they are operational.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Scott M. Algatt
> >
> > Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.
> >
> >
>
- Previous message: Aaron Turner: "Re: Changes in IDS Companies?"
- In reply to: Benjamin Keller: "Re: Snort Monitoring"
- Next in thread: Todd Holloway: "Re: Snort Monitoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|