Re: host-based ids evaluation
From: Talisker (talisker@networkintrusion.co.uk)Date: 08/15/02
- Previous message: raffael.marty@ch.pwcglobal.com: "Re: host-based ids evaluation"
- In reply to: Gianpiero Porchia: "R: host-based ids evaluation"
- Next in thread: roy lo: "Re: host-based ids evaluation"
- Next in thread: Talisker: "Re: host-based ids evaluation"
- Reply: roy lo: "Re: host-based ids evaluation"
- Reply: Gianpiero Porchia: "R: host-based ids evaluation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Talisker" <talisker@networkintrusion.co.uk> To: "Gianpiero Porchia" <gianpiero.porchia@atsweb.it>, "Gian Luca Valecchi" <glvalecchi@hotmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:15:27 +0100
Gian
> Today, in industry not exist a clear definition of HIDS. I think the best
> way to define an HIDS is to focus on
> its pros and cons against an NIDS.
I'd disagree, there are various publications out there that define the
different types of IDS.
a Host IDS looks within the host for evidence of intrusion. Primary focus is
on Syslogs/Event logs, for it to be termed an IDS over an event log manager
some correlation needs to be carried out between events and over time.
A Network IDS looks at the network promiscuously for instrusions on the wire
A Network Node IDS is installed on the network nodes (hosts) and looks non
promiscuously at network traffic destined for that node. What distinguishes
it from a personal firewall is it's ability to identify the type of
intrusion over just the port number and it's ability to report in to an
enterprise manager (though this last requirement is debatable)
A Hybrid IDS combines both the Network Node IDS and Host IDS.
I don't see File Integrity Checkers as Host IDS, I have heard some
discussion as to whether they should even be termed an IDS, same applies to
Honeypots.
HIDS Pros
> 2) Don't have bandwidth problems (looks only at its host traffic);
Most Host IDS Analysts need their HIDS to report events in, individual
console access isn't an option depending on how many hosts you monitor. Try
letting an NT4.0 password expire whilst the user is logged on. Then see the
HIDS scream in pain as it reports in, consuming big chunks of bandwidth.
Take care
-andy
- Previous message: raffael.marty@ch.pwcglobal.com: "Re: host-based ids evaluation"
- In reply to: Gianpiero Porchia: "R: host-based ids evaluation"
- Next in thread: roy lo: "Re: host-based ids evaluation"
- Next in thread: Talisker: "Re: host-based ids evaluation"
- Reply: roy lo: "Re: host-based ids evaluation"
- Reply: Gianpiero Porchia: "R: host-based ids evaluation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|