Re: two sniffers on the same eth ifc performance impact?
From: Anton Chuvakin (anton@chuvakin.org)Date: 03/27/02
- Previous message: Bryan Burns: "RE: two sniffers on the same eth ifc performance impact?"
- In reply to: o00o_j: "Re: two sniffers on the same eth ifc performance impact?"
- Next in thread: Thomas Porter, Ph.D.: "RE: two sniffers on the same eth ifc performance impact?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:53:12 -0500 (EST) From: Anton Chuvakin <anton@chuvakin.org> To: o00o_j <o00o_j@yahoo.com>
Hello,
>This may not be possible, and it's a very straightforward approach, but
>what about throwing a second NIC on the host and connecting both NIC's
Why would it not be possible? I tried that and it works fine, its the
performance I am worried about. Other people also reported success, but
with much better hardware than I have.
BTW, second NIC is not an option since I have an appliance-style PC with
no ability to upgrade.
Best,
--
Anton A. Chuvakin, Ph.D.
http://www.chuvakin.org
http://www.info-secure.org
- Previous message: Bryan Burns: "RE: two sniffers on the same eth ifc performance impact?"
- In reply to: o00o_j: "Re: two sniffers on the same eth ifc performance impact?"
- Next in thread: Thomas Porter, Ph.D.: "RE: two sniffers on the same eth ifc performance impact?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
