Re: *ICN - A Conspiracy of Inertia?
From: Nick Lange (nicklange@wi.rr.com)Date: 03/20/02
- Previous message: Benjamin Tomhave: "RE: *ICN - A Conspiracy of Inertia?"
- In reply to: Kerberus: "RE: *ICN - A Conspiracy of Inertia?"
- Next in thread: Bill McCarty: "RE: *ICN - A Conspiracy of Inertia?"
- Next in thread: Dragos Ruiu: "Re: *ICN - A Conspiracy of Inertia?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Nick Lange" <nicklange@wi.rr.com> To: "Kerberus" <kerberus@microbsd.net> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:16:19 -0600
Hi everyone,
Alright, this is rather amusing. I've been sitting here on my arse for a
long time now musing over apparently the same ideas. And I think others have
as well, but I'd like to check to make sure I'm on the right track here.
So their software basically is trend based IDS? That is, something [traffic
levels or content] breaks the trend beyond certain parameters and the kernel
is told to cut out said behaviour? What could be special are the equations
used to determine sketchy activity. But I doubt it. If this guy is training
based on traffic patterns what he doesn't realize is that over time the
amount of data is ENORMOUS... anyways before I take the time to write all my
thoughts down I suppose I should make sure I'm on the right track.
This really isn't a new idea, if I wasn't so damn lazy and maybe if I was a
graduate student this could have been up for debate a looong time ago
instead of someone claiming a cure all.
Cheers to anyone who has more detailed information on how this works, but
chances are it is not a cure all and the question remains to be seen if a
large scale deployment of this area of ids would be more cost effective than
paying lots of admins.
Cheers,
nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kerberus" <kerberus@microbsd.net>
To: "Benninghoff, John" <John.Benninghoff@Rbcdain.com>
Cc: <falcon@cybersecret.com>; <focus-ids@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 19:21
Subject: RE: *ICN - A Conspiracy of Inertia?
> Bingo!! Ive been running this software for a couple of weeks now, and
> also watching this thread with slight amusement. After speaking with the
> founders of cylant and their technical people a couple weeks back, and
> helping to debug some of the issues ive come across i would have to say
> after a period of measurement on a mail server, and a dns server I
> tested the software and it did detect anomalous activity generated by
> myself! Though it seems to measure the activities occurring during a
> "learning" or "recording" phase. Basically there is a set of kernel
> patches located on sourceforge for linux and freebsd, also openbsd, and
> with some tweaking and rebuilding, seeing as i refused to run a kernel
> built by someone other then me, i did get the system runnning, basically
> these kernel patches add what appear to be watch points at the kernel
> level and interact with the monitoring software! overall conceptually
> its good for limited host based server ids, ie... mail dns, web and only
> after a long period of time of recording what appears to be valid
> activity. now i wonder i build a web server, load the software, let it
> run for say a week, in record mode, then put it on the wire. what are my
> results! So as to say the software does its job, but it only detects
> activity its never seen before! I guess im a bit ahead of the curve
> here. Id also like to see others results if in fact anyone else has
> tried this software.
>
> On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 17:45, Benninghoff, John wrote:
> > After some research, I found the following paper:
http://www.cylant.com/whitepapers/acsac-2001.pdf. Apparently, the technology
described in the article has made its way into Cylant's CylantSecure
(http://www.cylant.com/products/cylantsecure.html) product.
> >
> > I couldn't find much else relating to the product, but I did find a
reported vulnerability;
> > http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/194287
> >
> > What little I've read so far looks interesting, but I remain skeptical
of its use in real-world installations (though Cylant does offer an
evaluation copy). I certainly wouldn't classify it as a "magic bullet" that
will fix all security problems.
> >
>
>
>
- Previous message: Benjamin Tomhave: "RE: *ICN - A Conspiracy of Inertia?"
- In reply to: Kerberus: "RE: *ICN - A Conspiracy of Inertia?"
- Next in thread: Bill McCarty: "RE: *ICN - A Conspiracy of Inertia?"
- Next in thread: Dragos Ruiu: "Re: *ICN - A Conspiracy of Inertia?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|