Re: Snort and Cisco Pix
From: Drew - Home (simonis@myself.com)Date: 10/25/01
- Previous message: r00t@online.ie: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix ()"
- In reply to: Greg Shipley: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- Next in thread: Frank Knobbe: "RE: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <01cd01c15d72$7c93a3f0$c9d8bfa8@DD9SW5MNNNH9TY> From: "Drew - Home" <simonis@myself.com> To: <focus-ids@securityfocus.com> Subject: Re: Snort and Cisco Pix Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:31:22 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Shipley" <gshipley@neohapsis.com>
> >
> > Are you sure about this ? The Cisco salesperson told us it was running
> > Linux, not NT.
>
> The Cisco sales person is wrong. It's NT, unless Cisco totally changed it
> recently.
>
Also, it is important to note that the packet capture is all done within the
context of a hardware accelerator. NT can't capture traffic very well, as
we probably all know, so all of those functions are accomplished on
dedicated hardware. There is no interaction with the NT stack.
- Previous message: r00t@online.ie: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix ()"
- In reply to: Greg Shipley: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- Next in thread: Frank Knobbe: "RE: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|