Re: Snort and Cisco Pix
From: Greg Shipley (gshipley@neohapsis.com)Date: 10/24/01
- Previous message: Hervé Debar: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- In reply to: Hervé Debar: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- Next in thread: r00t@online.ie: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix ()"
- Next in thread: Frank Knobbe: "RE: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- Reply: r00t@online.ie: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix ()"
- Reply: Drew - Home: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:05:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Greg Shipley <gshipley@neohapsis.com> To: <herve.debar@rd.francetelecom.com> Subject: Re: Snort and Cisco Pix Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110241104260.24521-100000@7of9.neohapsis.com>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Hervé Debar wrote:
> > occupies a useful slot in an expensive chassis. Additionally, if you
> > actually play with the unit, you'll realize that this blade is actually an
> > Intel PC running Windows NT 4. Though one does not have to interact with
> > windows during the operation of the device, you should know this.
>
> Are you sure about this ? The Cisco salesperson told us it was running
> Linux, not NT.
The Cisco sales person is wrong. It's NT, unless Cisco totally changed it
recently.
-Greg
- Previous message: Hervé Debar: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- In reply to: Hervé Debar: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- Next in thread: r00t@online.ie: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix ()"
- Next in thread: Frank Knobbe: "RE: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- Reply: r00t@online.ie: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix ()"
- Reply: Drew - Home: "Re: Snort and Cisco Pix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|