Comparing the performance of two IDS products with different architectures
From: iheagwarac@aol.comDate: 10/13/01
- Previous message: malj31: "Re: Realsecure"
- Next in thread: Veselin Mijuskovic: "Re: Comparing the performance of two IDS products with different architectures"
- Reply: Veselin Mijuskovic: "Re: Comparing the performance of two IDS products with different architectures"
- Reply: robert_david_graham: "RE: Comparing the performance of two IDS products with different architectures"
- Reply: RJ H: "RE: Comparing the performance of two IDS products with different architectures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: iheagwarac@aol.com Message-ID: <36.1d127b64.28fa03ba@aol.com> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 16:53:14 EDT Subject: Comparing the performance of two IDS products with different architectures To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com
Does anyone know if there is justification to compare the performance of IDS
products with pattern-matching technique with those IDS products that use
the state-based (protocol analysis)technique in the same network environments?
What will be the strenght of the arguments?
Charles
- Previous message: malj31: "Re: Realsecure"
- Next in thread: Veselin Mijuskovic: "Re: Comparing the performance of two IDS products with different architectures"
- Reply: Veselin Mijuskovic: "Re: Comparing the performance of two IDS products with different architectures"
- Reply: robert_david_graham: "RE: Comparing the performance of two IDS products with different architectures"
- Reply: RJ H: "RE: Comparing the performance of two IDS products with different architectures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]