Realsecure
From: yh lee (micklee74@hotmail.com)Date: 10/10/01
- Previous message: Bill Pool: "PostgreSQL and WIN32 (SNORT)"
- Next in thread: Jeroen Wortelboer: "Re: Realsecure"
- Reply: Jeroen Wortelboer: "Re: Realsecure"
- Reply: Bob Walder: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Peters, Michael D.: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: robert_david_graham: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Matt Willis: "FW: Realsecure"
- Reply: Bob Walder: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Bob Walder: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Reeves, Michael (GEAE, Compaq): "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Bob Walder: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Kohlenberg, Toby: "RE: Realsecure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "yh lee" <micklee74@hotmail.com> To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: Realsecure Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 02:27:32 Message-ID: <F202Ne0PaLI9mK6PYzD00001788@hotmail.com>
hi
is it better to run Realsecure Network sensor on Windows NT
or SUn solaris in terms of performance ??
what are the pros and cons of running on NT??
thanks
ekim
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
- Previous message: Bill Pool: "PostgreSQL and WIN32 (SNORT)"
- Next in thread: Jeroen Wortelboer: "Re: Realsecure"
- Reply: Jeroen Wortelboer: "Re: Realsecure"
- Reply: Bob Walder: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Peters, Michael D.: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: robert_david_graham: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Matt Willis: "FW: Realsecure"
- Reply: Bob Walder: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Bob Walder: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Reeves, Michael (GEAE, Compaq): "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Bob Walder: "RE: Realsecure"
- Reply: Kohlenberg, Toby: "RE: Realsecure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]