Re: Snort sensor placement
From: Florin Andrei (florin@sgi.com)Date: 09/28/01
- Previous message: Arthur Donchey: "RE: eEyeIsTheBest seen in http? (x-posted to Snort user list)"
- In reply to: Rui Lapa: "Re: Snort sensor placement"
- Next in thread: Dave Vehrs: "RE: Snort sensor placement"
- Next in thread: George Milliken: "RE: Snort sensor placement"
- Reply: Dave Vehrs: "RE: Snort sensor placement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Subject: Re: Snort sensor placement From: Florin Andrei <florin@sgi.com> To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Date: 27 Sep 2001 15:24:55 -0700 Message-Id: <1001629495.3565.29.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com>
On Thu, 2001-09-27 at 09:39, Rui Lapa wrote:
> Ever heard of receive only cables?
>
> http://personal.ie.cuhk.edu.hk/~msng0/sniffing_cable/
But, isn't this functionally identical to running the sensor on an
interface without an IP address?
If you activate the interface, but don't assign an IP address, Snort is
still able to run, but no IP connection could be made. It's the same
thing as with RO-cables, but simpler.
-- Florin Andrei"This is a Klingon." "Where did it came from?" "Oklahoma." (from Star Trek Enterprise series premiere)
- Previous message: Arthur Donchey: "RE: eEyeIsTheBest seen in http? (x-posted to Snort user list)"
- In reply to: Rui Lapa: "Re: Snort sensor placement"
- Next in thread: Dave Vehrs: "RE: Snort sensor placement"
- Next in thread: George Milliken: "RE: Snort sensor placement"
- Reply: Dave Vehrs: "RE: Snort sensor placement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]