Re: Snort sensor placement
From: Jose Nazario (jose@biocserver.BIOC.cwru.edu)Date: 09/21/01
- Previous message: mht@clark.net: "Re: About Netpower N-IDS"
- In reply to: Stuart Staniford: "Re: Snort sensor placement"
- Next in thread: Stuart Staniford: "Re: Snort sensor placement"
- Reply: Stuart Staniford: "Re: Snort sensor placement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:52:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Jose Nazario <jose@biocserver.BIOC.cwru.edu> To: Stuart Staniford <stuart@silicondefense.com> Subject: Re: Snort sensor placement Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0109211251530.766-100000@biocserver.BIOC.CWRU.Edu>
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Stuart Staniford wrote:
> That is a simple solution that should work (and is probably favorite
> if you already have the hub lying around).
ISTR that one should use a switch if possible (with a reflector or
spanning port) rather than a hub for performance reasons.
____________________________
jose nazario jose@cwru.edu
PGP: 89 B0 81 DA 5B FD 7E 00 99 C3 B2 CD 48 A0 07 80
PGP key ID 0xFD37F4E5 (pgp.mit.edu)
- Previous message: mht@clark.net: "Re: About Netpower N-IDS"
- In reply to: Stuart Staniford: "Re: Snort sensor placement"
- Next in thread: Stuart Staniford: "Re: Snort sensor placement"
- Reply: Stuart Staniford: "Re: Snort sensor placement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]