RE: New worm? 'readme.eml'
From: Dave Elfering (elfering@wernerlogistics.com)Date: 09/19/01
- Previous message: Naseer Bhatti: "Re: New worm? 'readme.eml'"
- Maybe in reply to: JKruser: "RE: New worm? 'readme.eml'"
- Next in thread: Duane Waddle: "RE: New worm? 'readme.eml'"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <CCAC4B1F2669D41185880050DAC83F41B25E5C@WLS-EXMB2> From: Dave Elfering <elfering@wernerlogistics.com> To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: New worm? 'readme.eml' Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 20:55:44 -0500
When I infected my little VMWare test box, it seemed to be trying to also go
to 227.1.116.127 and 239.119.219.117
This is very odd since those are multicast addresses. Anyone else seeing
this?
-David
-----Original Message-----
From: Naseer Bhatti [mailto:naseer@fibre.net.pk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:32 PM
To: Ferris, Thomas M; forensics@securityfocus.com
Cc: focus-ms@securityfocus.com; focus-ids@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: New worm? 'readme.eml'
> What would be a good solution for this, or is there an exact plan of
> attack to defend against this?
Yes, stop the outgoing smtp connections to the following mail servers
omega.serpro.gov.br (161.148.173.118)
server1.sans.org (167.216.133.33 )
smtp.china.com (61.135.144.88)
perninha.conectiva.com.br (200.250.58.156)
phuck.nether.net (204.42.254.5)
mx.ideal.ru (212.69.101.252)
tarkin.fdt.net (209.212.128.45)
The worm tries to send mail to these mail servers.
> Thanks in Advance.
>
> ================
> Thomas M. Ferris
> IA - Incident Response
> NMCI San Diego NOC
> ================
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JKruser [mailto:jkruser@adelphia.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:07
> To: Pedro Miller Rabinovitch; forensics@securityfocus.com
> Cc: focus-ms@securityfocus.com; focus-ids@securityfocus.com
> Subject: RE: New worm? 'readme.eml'
>
>
> I also see a very serious possibility of this work interacting with the
> still prevalent sircam virus. Nimda, when it infects, opens share drives
> on
> the infected PC...Sircam will scan for open shares on an internal
> network or
> cable subnet and infect the remote PC without user interaction. This
> could
> effectively increase the spread of sircam exponentially and, due to the
> remailing capability of sircam, could shut down mail servers in a short
> period of time.
>
> I have not verified this possibility but it sounds feasible.
>
> Claymore
> the unprofound
>
>
- Previous message: Naseer Bhatti: "Re: New worm? 'readme.eml'"
- Maybe in reply to: JKruser: "RE: New worm? 'readme.eml'"
- Next in thread: Duane Waddle: "RE: New worm? 'readme.eml'"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|