Re: ids inquisition
From: Sammo Hung (sp0re@digitz.org)Date: 07/25/01
- Previous message: Jeff Nathan: "Re: ids inquisition"
- In reply to: Jeff Nathan: "Re: ids inquisition"
- Next in thread: Ashworth, Robert C. [Contractor]: "RE: ids inquisition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Sammo Hung <sp0re@digitz.org> To: Jeff Nathan <jeff@wwti.com>, RJ H <huberrj@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: ids inquisition Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:19:33 -0400 Message-Id: <01072422193302.07823@snort>
touche.. well said. Your remarks as well as SuSE's sum up alot of my
feelings toward Marty's work. Marty, you kick serious posterior and I wish
you the best of luck with your new venture. Snort is the most enlightening
security product around (IMHO)... and for us newcomers, to be able to use a
powerful sensor such as Snort, to be able to manipulate it, write rules for
it, and on top of that, be part of an enormous community, is phenomenal.
Marty, thanks for your support, and hard work, if there is anything I can
ever offer in return.. just name it.
peace,
Mike Poor
> Not that I can attempt to follow up SuSE's post too well but maybe I can
> quash this pretty quickly. Companies market their stuff, that's life.
> They want to make money. What else can I say? Snort is over 56,000
> lines long of code now and every line of it is free for your use. The
> commercial side of snort is in addition to the snort you already know
> and love.
- Previous message: Jeff Nathan: "Re: ids inquisition"
- In reply to: Jeff Nathan: "Re: ids inquisition"
- Next in thread: Ashworth, Robert C. [Contractor]: "RE: ids inquisition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|