Re: readdir_r considered harmful
From: Ben Hutchings (ben_at_decadentplace.org.uk)
Date: 11/01/05
- Previous message: Ben Hutchings: "readdir_r considered harmful"
- In reply to: Ben Hutchings: "readdir_r considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Casper.Dik_at_Sun.COM: "Re: readdir_r considered harmful"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com, full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:16:42 +0000
I wrote:
> readdir_r considered harmful
> ============================
A second revision of this advisory (and any future revisions) can be
found at <http://womble.decadentplace.org.uk/readdir_r-advisory.html>.
I have updated the recommendations to cover HP-UX and Tru64 properly.
Ben.
-- Ben Hutchings When you say `I wrote a program that crashed Windows', people just stare ... and say `Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*'. - Linus Torvalds
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Ben Hutchings: "readdir_r considered harmful"
- In reply to: Ben Hutchings: "readdir_r considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Casper.Dik_at_Sun.COM: "Re: readdir_r considered harmful"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]