Re: [Full-disclosure] SEC-Consult SA 20051025-0 :: Snoopy Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
From: Florian Weimer (fw_at_deneb.enyo.de)
Date: 10/27/05
- Previous message: Williams, James K: "Re: Multiple Vendor Anti-Virus Software Detection Evasion Vulnerability through forged magic byte"
- In reply to: Bernhard Mueller: "SEC-Consult SA 20051025-0 :: Snoopy Remote Code Execution Vulnerability"
- Next in thread: SEC Consult Research: "Re: [Full-disclosure] SEC-Consult SA 20051025-0 :: Snoopy Remote Code Execution Vulnerability"
- Reply: SEC Consult Research: "Re: [Full-disclosure] SEC-Consult SA 20051025-0 :: Snoopy Remote Code Execution Vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Bernhard Mueller <research@sec-consult.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:12:37 +0200
* Bernhard Mueller:
> While the vulnerability can not be exploited using the Snoopy class
> file itself, there may exist implementations which hand unchecked
> URLs from users to snoopy.
Thanks for the notice.
Have you considered in your analysis that malicious servers might
return HTTP redirects which contain suitable URLs? This requires that
the offsiteok member is set to true, though, because in the version I
looked at, only http:// URLs are considered site-local.
(Note: I haven't tried to exploit this, I just browsed the code.)
- Previous message: Williams, James K: "Re: Multiple Vendor Anti-Virus Software Detection Evasion Vulnerability through forged magic byte"
- In reply to: Bernhard Mueller: "SEC-Consult SA 20051025-0 :: Snoopy Remote Code Execution Vulnerability"
- Next in thread: SEC Consult Research: "Re: [Full-disclosure] SEC-Consult SA 20051025-0 :: Snoopy Remote Code Execution Vulnerability"
- Reply: SEC Consult Research: "Re: [Full-disclosure] SEC-Consult SA 20051025-0 :: Snoopy Remote Code Execution Vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]