Re: secure client-side platform

devnull_at_Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA
Date: 09/01/05

  • Next message: Mariano Nuņez Di Croce: "CYBSEC - Multiple Vendor Web Vulnerability Scanner Arbitrary Script Injection Vulnerability"
    Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:50:29 -0400 (EDT)
    To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
    
    

    [As usual, the From: is a black hole, as a broken-autoresponder
    defense. Use the address in the signature if you want to reach me.]

    > imagine i'm going to access an e-gold aco*** of $1M ...
    > first [...]; then [...]; [...]
    > i cannot figure out what could go wrong in the above process ...

    How about a "reflash your BIOS" infection? I've heard of malware loose
    in the wild that trashes flashable BIOSes; it would take only a little
    more care to build one that flashes a carefully infected image instead.

    I've never liked the flashable BIOS idea, though I'm OK with it if
    there's a way to disable reflashing that can't be changed by software
    (eg, a jumper must be on a certain pair of pins). I've seen boards
    which "defend" against malware reflashing them by having two copies,
    both flashable, which may help against getting randomly trashed but is
    of no value against careful malicious reflashing; whatever the vendor
    reflashing software can do, malware can do too.

    > Q: can you really trust Google?

    Trust Google with what? Trust Google to do, or not do, what?

    No, I don't actually myself care about the answers to those. I'm just
    trying to point out that trust is not a simple yes-or-no thing. For
    example, I trust my upstream to deliver (almost) all of the data I send
    through them unchanged, but I don't trust them with my passwords on
    other than their machines.

    /~\ The ASCII der Mouse
    \ / Ribbon Campaign
     X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
    / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B


  • Next message: Mariano Nuņez Di Croce: "CYBSEC - Multiple Vendor Web Vulnerability Scanner Arbitrary Script Injection Vulnerability"