Re: [lists] Combining Hashes
From: Elliott Bäck (ecb29_at_cornell.edu)
Date: 02/19/05
- Previous message: unmanarc: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- In reply to: Kent Borg: "Combining Hashes"
- Next in thread: Felix Cuello: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:14:27 -0500 To: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>, bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Kent Borg wrote:
>I admit I don't know why this might be significantly better than
>d1+d2, I was hoping someone here would.
>
>
I think there are a couple things going on here. First, since + is
concatenation, SHA-1(SHA-1(data)+data+MD5(data)) provides an input to
the hash that is three times as long as before. I'm also not familiar
with the inner workings on SHA-1 and MD-5, but the second idea here is
that they both represent (somewhat) orthogonal solution spaces, so that
the concatenation of both of them adds more dimensionality and therefore
more uniqueness.
However, I am just guessing here off the top of my head.
Thanks,
Elliott C. Bäck
607-229-0623
http://elliottback.com
- Previous message: unmanarc: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- In reply to: Kent Borg: "Combining Hashes"
- Next in thread: Felix Cuello: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]