Combining Hashes
From: Kent Borg (kentborg_at_borg.org)
Date: 02/18/05
- Previous message: Greg Merideth: "Re: Phishing hole found in IE and OE"
- Next in thread: unmanarc: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- Reply: unmanarc: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- Reply: Elliott Bäck: "Re: [lists] Combining Hashes"
- Reply: Felix Cuello: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- Reply: exon: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:24:19 -0500 To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Concatenating two different hashes, for example SHA-1 and MD5,
apparently does not add as much security as one might hope.
What about more complicated compositions? For example, a reader
comment posted on Bruce Schneier's blog
(http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html)
suggests the following:
d1=SHA-1(data)
d2=MD5(data)
d3=SHA-1(d1+data+d2)
The final digest would be d1+d2+d3
(where "+" is concatenation)
I admit I don't know why this might be significantly better than
d1+d2, I was hoping someone here would.
-kb
- Previous message: Greg Merideth: "Re: Phishing hole found in IE and OE"
- Next in thread: unmanarc: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- Reply: unmanarc: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- Reply: Elliott Bäck: "Re: [lists] Combining Hashes"
- Reply: Felix Cuello: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- Reply: exon: "Re: Combining Hashes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]