MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Today
From: Pavel Machek (pavel_at_ucw.cz)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:39:41 +0100 To: Dan Kaminsky <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> I've been doing some analysis on MD5 collision announced by Wang et al.
> Short version: Yes, Virginia, there is no such thing as a safe hash
> collision -- at least in a function that's specified to be
> cryptographically secure. The full details may be acquired at the
> following link:
Yes, nice paper, and here you have nice story:
Okay, lets have two friends and one horse. Let's say Pavel and
Bara. Bara owns a horse, and needs money, so she wants to sell
it. Horse has some problems with its back, and Bara would be willing
to sell it for around $1300. Therefore she's quite surprised when
Pavel offers her $14000, and agrees immediately.
I'd like to buy Fita. If you accept my offer (msg1), just sign and
send it back.
:~/misc/md5$ cat msg1
I agree to sell you my horse ^Fita^, its saddle and harness for price 14000 dollars. Signed Bara
:~/misc/md5$ md5sum msg1
(Bara signs msg1 and sends it back to Pavel). Two days later, Pavel
comes with a car, and $1000. Bara denies she offered Fita for $1000,
but can not find copy of the e-mail exchange. Fortunately Pavel has a
copy with him, digitaly signed by Bara. They view it on her computer,
and verify the signatures. At that point Bara agrees she probably made
a mistake, and accepts $1000...
:~/misc/md5$ cat msg2
I agree to sell you my horse ^Fita^, its saddle and harness for price 1´000 dollars. Signed Bara
:~/misc/md5$ md5sum msg2
(With apologies to Bara; let's hope she'll never find out).
PS: I tried it on linux console, and it does some nasty terminal
tricks. Of course, if Bara investigated, she'd probably found out
-- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
- application/octet-stream attachment: msg1
- application/octet-stream attachment: msg2