Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?
Casper.Dik_at_Sun.COM
Date: 11/24/04
- Previous message: advisory_at_stgsecurity.com: "STG Security Advisory: [SSA-20041122-11] JSPWiki XSS vulnerability"
- In reply to: James Youngman: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Next in thread: Martin Buchholz: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Reply: Martin Buchholz: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Reply: James Youngman: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: James Youngman <bugtraq@excession.spiral-arm.org> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:51:38 +0100
>I can see that that would be useful but it would fail to comply with
>the POSIX standard, which specifies:
>
> The find utility shall be able to descend to arbitrary
> depths in a file hierarchy and shall not fail due to path
> length limitations (unless a path operand specified by the
> application exceeds {PATH_MAX} requirements)
But PATH_MAX is limited and the number of file descriptors is perhaps
not.
(On Solaris, PATH_MAX is 1024 so you require at most 512 file
descriptors to keep the stack of directories: 512 is less than the
default hard limit of 65536 file descriptors per process [S9, S8
and before used 1024, still >> 512)
Casper
- Previous message: advisory_at_stgsecurity.com: "STG Security Advisory: [SSA-20041122-11] JSPWiki XSS vulnerability"
- In reply to: James Youngman: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Next in thread: Martin Buchholz: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Reply: Martin Buchholz: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Reply: James Youngman: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]