Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?
Casper.Dik_at_Sun.COM
Date: 11/24/04
- Previous message: Martin Buchholz: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- In reply to: Martin Buchholz: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Next in thread: James Youngman: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Martin.Buchholz@Sun.COM Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:29:08 +0100
>I am genuinely surprised that Solaris still has such a
>relatively small PATH_MAX. Linux has 4096.
Really, there are things you cannot change because of
binary compatibility. PATH_MAX is one.
Having a 4K path seems rather pointless; the longest path on my
system is 225 bytes; a factor of 4 over that borders on the ridiculous.
>Like other arbitrary system limits of its ilk, PATH_MAX
>is evil, and is one of the more persuasive arguments for
>getting rid of the C language and its fixed-size
>stack-allocated buffers.
>
>char path[PATH_MAX]; /* considered harmful */
Evil, yes, but old source code never dies.
Casper
- Previous message: Martin Buchholz: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- In reply to: Martin Buchholz: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Next in thread: James Youngman: "Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Loading