Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor
From: Adam Shostack (adam_at_homeport.org)
Date: 09/28/04
- Previous message: james_love_at_agilent.com: "Possible GDI Exploit Vector"
- In reply to: Paul Wouters: "RE: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor"
- Next in thread: Greg A. Woods: "RE: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:08:24 -0400 To: Paul Wouters <paul@xtdnet.nl>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:25:33PM +0200, Paul Wouters wrote:
| Diebold has proven to not earn the trust of the public. It deserves to lose
| money, or even go bankrupt. That's capitalism. You screw up and your product
| no longer sells and you go do something else. Perhaps Diebold can go into
| the playing cards business.
That's unlikely. The Nevada Gaming Commission is quite strict about
how it checks machinery, and Diebold would doubtless fail.
- Previous message: james_love_at_agilent.com: "Possible GDI Exploit Vector"
- In reply to: Paul Wouters: "RE: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor"
- Next in thread: Greg A. Woods: "RE: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]