Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes

From: Matthew Keller (mgkeller_at_users.sourceforge.net)
Date: 09/28/04

  • Next message: mgotts_at_2roads.com: "RE: Microsoft's GDI Detetection Tool faults" 
    To: Nicholas Knight <nknight@runawaynet.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:33:09 -0400

    On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 13:16, Nicholas Knight wrote:
    > Unrealistic? It is a *voting system*! It does exactly *one* *very*
    > *simple* thing! If it cannot do it bug-free, its developers are
    > incompetent and should not be allowed anywhere near a compiler, much
    > less the key to democracy.

    Thank you. This is the most rational post I've seen.

    if(VoteForBush) { bush++; }
    elseif(VoteForKerry) { kerry++; }
    elseif(VoteForNader) { nader++; }

    Is not tough. Diebold's refusal to allow the world to see that is highly
    suspicious. I suppose I'll get sued under the DMCA for posting their
    intellectual property now... Or maybe I have to change line 2 to:
    elseif(VoteForKerry) { bush++; } first... There, let the lawsuits rain
    in.

  • Next message: mgotts_at_2roads.com: "RE: Microsoft's GDI Detetection Tool faults"