Re: CVS woes: .cvspass
From: Delian Krustev (krustev_at_krustev.net)
Date: 07/29/04
- Previous message: Thierry Carrez: "[ GLSA 200407-23 ] SoX: Multiple buffer overflows"
- In reply to: Greg A. Woods: "Re: CVS woes: .cvspass"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:31:40 +0300
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 23:20, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> Anyone using the CVS pserver mechanism for anything other than totally
> anonymous access gets only what they deserve.
brr, do not forget that the security might be guaranteed on different
layers. E.g. ipsec secures the insecure protocols(the ones that transfer
data in plain text or with weak encryption), such as telnet or cvs
with pserver.
- Previous message: Thierry Carrez: "[ GLSA 200407-23 ] SoX: Multiple buffer overflows"
- In reply to: Greg A. Woods: "Re: CVS woes: .cvspass"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]