Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour.
From: David Malone (dwmalone_at_cnri.dit.ie)
Date: 05/14/04
- Previous message: Michael Wojcik: "RE: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour."
- In reply to: Michael Wojcik: "RE: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour."
- Next in thread: Michael Shigorin: "Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour."
- Reply: Michael Shigorin: "Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour."
- Reply: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha: "Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Michael Wojcik <Michael.Wojcik@MicroFocus.com> Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 19:49:07 +0100
> (*)Contrary to the FAQ entry you cited, it is sometimes useful to change the
> ownership of a symlink. Since the owner of a symlink can be detected by a
> program, there can exist programs which depend on it.
Yes, indeed. As another example, Apache has an option to only follow
symlinks if they belong to the right person.
David.
- Previous message: Michael Wojcik: "RE: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour."
- In reply to: Michael Wojcik: "RE: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour."
- Next in thread: Michael Shigorin: "Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour."
- Reply: Michael Shigorin: "Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour."
- Reply: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha: "Re: Curious fileutils/coreutils behaviour."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|