RE: Hysterical first technical alert from US-CERT
From: Stephen Martin (martins_at_tigerfuel.com)
Date: 02/10/04
- Previous message: Frank Louwers: "Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability"
- Maybe in reply to: Larry Seltzer: "Hysterical first technical alert from US-CERT"
- Next in thread: Piotr KUCHARSKI: "Re: RFC: virus handling"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: 'Shawn McMahon' <smcmahon@eiv.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:48:48 -0500
> One thing nobody seems to want to recognize as a possibility here is
> that MyDoom.B didn't take off as much as MyDoom.A precisely BECAUSE of
> the US-CERT email. A lot of members of the press took that pretty
> seriously, and warnings on the evening network news shows that you
> shouldn't open these attachments are bound to have prevented at least
> some infections.
I would describe the MyDoom virus as hitting the main stream media several
days prior [01.27.03] to CERT's email. Most people [non-tech] that I talked
to, after 01.27ish had already heard of it and were extremely wary of
opening
anything.
Albeit their e-mail was a catapult to further media coverage, their report
was misrepresentative of the malware...which should be the bottom line.
Regards,
Stephen L. Martin
- Previous message: Frank Louwers: "Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability"
- Maybe in reply to: Larry Seltzer: "Hysterical first technical alert from US-CERT"
- Next in thread: Piotr KUCHARSKI: "Re: RFC: virus handling"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]