Re: vulnerabilities of postscript printers

From: Nicolas Gregoire (ngregoire_at_exaprobe.com)
Date: 02/10/04

  • Next message: Randal, Phil: "RE: getting rid of outbreaks and spam" 
    To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:11:42 +0100

    On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 10:15, Dragos Ruiu wrote:

    > Network attached printers are good portscanners in practice :-).

    And their poor IP stacks are easy to use for Idle scans, allowing to
    hide the real source of packets.

    And you could too keep your sploits on their hard-drive, which could be
    the only one of the network without an AV monitoring it. 

    -- 
Nicolas Gregoire ----- Consultant en Sécurité des Systèmes d'Information
ngregoire@exaprobe.com ------[ ExaProbe ]------ http://www.exaprobe.com/
PGP KeyID:CA61B44F  FingerPrint:1CC647FF1A55664BA2D2AFDACA6A21DACA61B44F
  • Next message: Randal, Phil: "RE: getting rid of outbreaks and spam"

    Relevant Pages