OpenBSD kernel holes ...

noir_at_uberhax0r.net
Date: 11/18/03

  • Next message: http-equiv_at_excite.com: "Re: Security researchers organization"
    Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:54:39 -0500 (EST)
    To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
    
    
    

    once again i am honored to present you a generic and robust way to own
    OpenBSD 2.x-3.x, enjoy ;)

    it is quite funny to name ring 0 overflow patches as "reliability fixes".
    who does theo thinks he is fooling ? kiddies in his cult ?

    you can patch your useless/old openbsd systems by visiting;
    http://www.gentoo.org
    http://www.grsecurity.net

    - noir

    from http://www.wideopenbsd.org/errata.html

    All architectures

         005: RELIABILITY FIX: November 4, 2003
         It is possible for a local user to cause a system panic by executing
         a specially crafted binary with an invalid header.
         A source code patch exists which remedies the problem.

    reliability ??? ehh ;-P yeah yeah right!

    
    



  • Next message: http-equiv_at_excite.com: "Re: Security researchers organization"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: How safe is a "Limited" XP account?
      ... as in there's actually a user interface and documentation. ... you have branches and forks. ... > OpenBSD itself is a fork off NetBSD. ... "One ring to rule them all, ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: How safe is a "Limited" XP account?
      ... as in there's actually a user interface and documentation. ... you have branches and forks. ... > OpenBSD itself is a fork off NetBSD. ... "One ring to rule them all, ...
      (comp.security.misc)
    • Re: How safe is a "Limited" XP account?
      ... as in there's actually a user interface and documentation. ... you have branches and forks. ... > OpenBSD itself is a fork off NetBSD. ... "One ring to rule them all, ...
      (comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security)