Re: msblast.d and a review of defensive worms
From: Nicholas Weaver (nweaver_at_CS.berkeley.edu)
Date: 08/21/03
- Previous message: SecureNet Service(SNS) Spiffy Reviews: "[SNS Advisory No.68] Internet Explorer Object Type Buffer Overflow in Double-Byte Character Set Environment"
- In reply to: Nicholas Weaver: "Re: msblast.d and a review of defensive worms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:07:55 -0700 To: "David J. Meltzer" <djm@intrusec.com>
I think this article (posted on the Nanog list) should be the final
nail in the coffin on "defensive worms".
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2003/0819navy.html
Reportedly 3/4s of the Navy Marines Corps Internet was unusable
because of the "beneficial" Welchia (patching RPC) worm. Network
operations is at least partially outsourced to EDS, but the article
doesn't state who is responsible for administering the machines.
-- Nicholas C. Weaver nweaver@cs.berkeley.edu
- Previous message: SecureNet Service(SNS) Spiffy Reviews: "[SNS Advisory No.68] Internet Explorer Object Type Buffer Overflow in Double-Byte Character Set Environment"
- In reply to: Nicholas Weaver: "Re: msblast.d and a review of defensive worms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]