Xinetd 2.3.10 Memory Leaks

From: Steve Grubb (
Date: 04/18/03

  • Next message: einstein, dhtm: "Exploit for PoPToP PPTP server"
    Date: 18 Apr 2003 16:18:36 -0000
    From: Steve Grubb <>
    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)


    Xinetd is a popular inetd replacement. Shortly after the 2.3.9 release in
    September 2002, it was realized that xinetd was leaking file descriptors.
    That problem turned out to be that file descriptors were not always being
    closed whenever a connection was rejected. 2.3.10 was released with this
    fixup among others in January.

    Sometime in February, a machine that I admin was hit by an ftp worm. It
    created > 5000 connections in 1 second. Xinetd promptly keeled over.
    Xinetd had been running for over a month with no downtime. The machine has
    next to no ftp traffic and only from 2 sources, so it was configured to be
    run via xinetd rejecting connections via tcp_wrappers. The machine had
    weathered worm attacks in the past, so this puzzled me.


    Eventually, I started looking at xinetd with valgrind. I used the
    following commandline:

    valgrind --leak-check=yes --leak-resolution=med --num-callers=8 \
     --logfile-fd=9 /usr/sbin/xinetd -d -pidfile /var/run/ \
     -stayalive 9> out.txt

    Depending on your setup, you may need to use something higher than 9.
    Xinetd was tested on connections that succeed and connections that are
    rejected due to configuration settings. The easiest way to test this is to
    use the following setup for chargen:

    service chargen
            type = INTERNAL
            user = root
            protocol = tcp
            wait = no
            access_times = 2:00-3:00
    # only_from =
    # no_access =

    The point is to set it up in a way that the connection is guaranteed to be
    rejected. Then do a:

    telnet localhost chargen
    After a couple seconds "ctl-] quit"
    Then, /etc/rc.d/init.d/xinetd stop

    Valgrind reports the following:

    ==18939== 144 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 36 of 45
    ==18939== at 0x40160DB8: malloc (vg_clientfuncs.c:103)
    ==18939== by 0x804FE22: (within /usr/sbin/xinetd)
    ==18939== by 0x805A496: (within /usr/sbin/xinetd)
    ==18939== by 0x8053611: (within /usr/sbin/xinetd)
    ==18939== by 0x805340D: (within /usr/sbin/xinetd)
    ==18939== by 0x40294A46: __libc_start_main (in /lib/
    ==18939== by 0x804A310: (within /usr/sbin/xinetd)

    Using objdump -S /usr/sbin/xinetd, the block of code in question comes
    from service.c:

    void svc_request( struct service *sp )
       connection_s *cp ;
       status_e ret_code;
       cp = conn_new( sp ) ;
       if ( cp == CONN_NULL )
          return ;
       if (sp->svc_not_generic)
               ret_code = spec_service_handler(sp, cp);
               ret_code = svc_generic_handler(sp, cp);
       if ( ret_code != OK )
          if ( SVC_LOGS_USERID_ON_FAILURE( sp ) )
             if( spec_service_handler( LOG_SERVICE( ps ), cp ) == FAILED ) {
                conn_free( cp, 1 );

    The above code has several problems. One background piece of information
    is that the sigchld handler in xinetd (child_exit->server_end->
    svc_postmortem) normally frees the connection's data. If the ret_code is
    not OK, the connection was only closed. This is little more than close(cp-
    >co_descriptor); This does not free cp since sigchld will not be called.
    It was only if the log service call failed that the connection was freed.

    The above code also did not take into account ret_code == OK if the
    service was no_wait or special. In both of those cases, the sigchld
    handler is not invoked so the memory pointed to by cp is lost when the
    call returns.


    The memory area pointed to by cp is 144 bytes. Since the variable goes out
    of scope, it is permanently lost with no way of finding it again. The
    memory losses are cumulative, too. It would take little more than

    while true; do telnet localhost chargen < /dev/null; done;

    to DOS the services provided by xinetd if you could identify a machine
    that uses xinetd to reject connections. Xinetd provides a rich set of
    options for rejecting connections, this includes: tcp_wrappers, only_from,
    no_access, sensors, access_times, cps, load_avg, etc.

    It should also be noted that if you DO NOT have any statements in the
    xinetd.conf file that would cause xinetd to reject a connection, then you
    are free from this problem.


    Xinetd 2.3.11 fixes the memory leaks as well as other problems discovered
    since 2.3.10 was released. All users of xinetd 2.3.10 are strongly urged
    to upgrade ASAP to avoid DOS conditions. Anyone running 2.3.9 is also
    strongly urged to upgrade since they are leaking file descriptors.

    Your xinetd version can be determined by typing "xinetd -version" (that's
    version with 1 dash).

    The new tarball is:

    This problem has been assigned CAN-2003-0211 to track the bug.

    This bug was also reported here:

    If you are affected, see if your vendor has an updated xinetd for you.

    -Steve Grubb

  • Next message: einstein, dhtm: "Exploit for PoPToP PPTP server"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: How secure is inetd nowadays?
      ... There is no predefined limit to the number of instances, in this case, an attacker can open thousands of connections resulting in thousands of processes. ... And no, xinetd won't necessarily save you, although it may provide you with some configuration options you can set that will help. ... In certain ways, inetd is superior to xinetd, and preferable. ...
    • [UNIX] Xinetd Memory Leaks
      ... The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: ... A vulnerability in Xinetd allows remote attackers to cause the program to ... leak memory, by causing enough memory leakage a computer running Xinetd ... It created> 5000 connections in 1 second. ...
    • [Fwd: Xinetd 2.3.10 Memory Leaks]
      ... > Xinetd is a popular inetd replacement. ... > closed whenever a connection was rejected. ... > run via xinetd rejecting connections via tcp_wrappers. ... > handler is not invoked so the memory pointed to by cp is lost when the ...
    • Re: allow and deny ih fedora 7
      ... network connections to the Internet. ... But in Fedora 7 by default there is neither inetd nor xinetd. ... The relevant software is called "tcp_wrappers". ...
    • RE: xinetd and hosts.allow
      ... I cannot get xinetd and tcp wrappers hosts.allow and hosts.deny to work. ... connections to these ports, but I was thinking tcp wrappers would add to ... To unsubscribe: --- ...