Re: URGENT SECURITY ADVISORY FOR SSH SECURE SHELL 3.0.0
From: Brian Carpio (carb02@csgsystems.com)Date: 07/23/01
- Previous message: Joop Stakenborg: "pileup 1.2"
- In reply to: Marcin Zurakowski: "Re: URGENT SECURITY ADVISORY FOR SSH SECURE SHELL 3.0.0"
- Next in thread: Stephanie Thomas: "Re: URGENT SECURITY ADVISORY FOR SSH SECURE SHELL 3.0.0"
- Next in thread: Jaime BENJUMEA: "Re: URGENT SECURITY ADVISORY FOR SSH SECURE SHELL 3.0.0"
- Reply: Stephanie Thomas: "Re: URGENT SECURITY ADVISORY FOR SSH SECURE SHELL 3.0.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:31:06 -0600 (MDT) From: Brian Carpio <carb02@csgsystems.com> To: Marcin Zurakowski <marcin@interfirma.pl> Subject: Re: URGENT SECURITY ADVISORY FOR SSH SECURE SHELL 3.0.0 Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10107231030340.15120-100000@sylvester.co.csgsystems.com>
OpenSSH is not vulnerable at all weather or not you use PAM.. this is SSH
the commercial Version.
If you didn't pay for it then you are OK!!
--------------
Brian Carpio
CSG Systems Inc.
Open Systems Unix System Admin
x3317
--------------
--- Security is a Process NOT a Product ----
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Marcin Zurakowski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Stephanie Thomas wrote:
>
> > an empty password. This affects SSH Secure Shell 3.0.0
>
> I guess openssh with pam support is not vulnerable??
>
> --
>
> Marcin Zurakowski
>
> InterFirma Administrator
>
>
>
- Previous message: Joop Stakenborg: "pileup 1.2"
- In reply to: Marcin Zurakowski: "Re: URGENT SECURITY ADVISORY FOR SSH SECURE SHELL 3.0.0"
- Next in thread: Stephanie Thomas: "Re: URGENT SECURITY ADVISORY FOR SSH SECURE SHELL 3.0.0"
- Next in thread: Jaime BENJUMEA: "Re: URGENT SECURITY ADVISORY FOR SSH SECURE SHELL 3.0.0"
- Reply: Stephanie Thomas: "Re: URGENT SECURITY ADVISORY FOR SSH SECURE SHELL 3.0.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|