Re: Performance of scp with OpenSSH - 5.1p1
- From: Greg Wooledge <wooledg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:29:23 -0400
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:52:13PM +0530, S, Senthilprabu (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
With OpenSSH-5.1p1:-
------------------------
Protocol Time taken rate MB/s
Std. scp 53.7 19.3
scp -c arcfour 40.1 26.3
scp -c blowfish 55.5 18.6
scp -C 123.6 16.3
With OpenSSH-4.5p1:-
-------------------------
Protocol Time taken rate MB/s
Std. scp 59.9 17.9
scp -c arcfour 45 22.3
scp -c blowfish 59.6 17.1
scp -C 131 14.1
Let's reformat your data just a bit:
Protocol 4.5p1 MB/s 5.1p1 MB/s increase
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Std. scp 17.9 19.3 8%
arcfour 22.3 26.3 18%
blowfish 17.1 18.6 9%
scp -C 14.1 16.3 16%
I do not see any higher throughput (20%) with the 5.1p1 (with UMAC-64)
than 4.5p1. The above results clearly says it is not increasing the
performance by 20%. Did I something here?.
I'd say the 16% and 18% figures give reasonable credibility to the
"approximately 20% faster" claim.
- References:
- Performance of scp with OpenSSH - 5.1p1
- From: S, Senthilprabu (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
- Performance of scp with OpenSSH - 5.1p1
- Prev by Date: Performance of scp with OpenSSH - 5.1p1
- Next by Date: RE: Performance of scp with OpenSSH - 5.1p1
- Previous by thread: Performance of scp with OpenSSH - 5.1p1
- Next by thread: RE: Performance of scp with OpenSSH - 5.1p1
- Index(es):