Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why? (SUMMARY)
- From: "Kosala Atapattu" <kosala.atapattu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 07:13:31 +0300
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:21 PM, David Edwards <DEdwards@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ron,
I do agree that allowing root access in some cases does make sense.
Are we missing something. Tell me that I don't understand something
here. How can a user doing "su -" and jumping to root after login with
a regular user be different from login with direct root.
Where the first option provide extra barrier for a hacker and second
lets someone do the root dance easily.
Kosala
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why?
- From: j debert
- Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why? (SUMMARY)
- From: Mario Spiegel
- Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why?
- References:
- Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why?
- From: Ron Arts
- Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why?
- From: Mario Platt
- RE: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why?
- From: Glenn Pitcher
- Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why? (SUMMARY)
- From: Ron Arts
- Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why? (SUMMARY)
- From: David Edwards
- Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why?
- Prev by Date: Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why? (SUMMARY)
- Next by Date: Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why? (SUMMARY)
- Previous by thread: Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why? (SUMMARY)
- Next by thread: Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why? (SUMMARY)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|