Re: Effective bandwidth reduction over WAN
From: Jeff Rosowski (rosowskij_at_ie.ymp.gov)
Date: 08/04/05
- Previous message: Michael Mannsberger: "Re: passphrase/ssh2"
- In reply to: Terry Browning: "Re: Effective bandwidth reduction over WAN"
- Next in thread: David Cress: "Re: Effective bandwidth reduction over WAN"
- Reply: David Cress: "Re: Effective bandwidth reduction over WAN"
- Reply: Peter Kjellström: "Re: Effective bandwidth reduction over WAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:04:43 -0700 (PDT) To: Terry Browning <linux-focus@nihil.co.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>> The results were
>>
>> 0 latency FTP – Ave. 39.5 mbps SCP – Ave. 39.4 mbps SFTP –
>> Ave. 38.8 mbps
>>
>> 60 millisec FTP – Ave. 37.7 mbps SCP – Ave. 2.9 mbps SFTP –
>> Ave. 2.9 mbps
>>
>> 100 millisec FTP – Ave. 33.0 mbps SCP – Ave. 2.0 mbps SFTP –
>> Ave. 1.8 mbps
>>
>> Can anyone tell me why the throughput of SCP and SFTP drop so
>> drastically when we try to use SSP protocols over a WAN?
Your problem is TCP itself. You can tweak your tcp window sizes, to let
you have more packets in flight. You could also use something that would
open multiple tcp connections for a single transfer.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/
iD8DBQFC8kqrTs2s3OoD6D8RApi6AJkBzj2W/Kza9EjgdRR72ga1W4iDZQCeMPVm
myv7gwfj39smgaAji0tluw0=
=YKCu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: Michael Mannsberger: "Re: passphrase/ssh2"
- In reply to: Terry Browning: "Re: Effective bandwidth reduction over WAN"
- Next in thread: David Cress: "Re: Effective bandwidth reduction over WAN"
- Reply: David Cress: "Re: Effective bandwidth reduction over WAN"
- Reply: Peter Kjellström: "Re: Effective bandwidth reduction over WAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]