Re: ssh .vs. rsh
From: Atro Tossavainen (atossava_at_cc.helsinki.fi)
Date: 01/26/04
- Previous message: Robert L Sowders: "Re: ssh .vs. rsh"
- In reply to: Robert L Sowders: "Re: ssh .vs. rsh"
- Next in thread: Sasha: "Re: ssh .vs. rsh"
- Reply: Sasha: "Re: ssh .vs. rsh"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: secureshell@securityfocus.com Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:34:36 +0200 (EET)
Robert,
> If you're not worried about encrypting the X session then just turn off
> the cypher or select none on your client. The login is still encrypted.
You're mistaken. If you select the "none" cipher, nothing is encrypted.
The "none" cipher might not be allowed on the client, or on the server,
or on either. I am under the impression that it is disabled by default
on OpenSSH, which is of course the sensible thing to do.
-- Atro Tossavainen (Mr.) / The Institute of Biotechnology at Systems Analyst, Techno-Amish & / the University of Helsinki, Finland, +358-9-19158939 UNIX Dinosaur / employs me, but my opinions are my own. < URL : http : / / www . helsinki . fi / %7E atossava / > NO FILE ATTACHMENTS
- Previous message: Robert L Sowders: "Re: ssh .vs. rsh"
- In reply to: Robert L Sowders: "Re: ssh .vs. rsh"
- Next in thread: Sasha: "Re: ssh .vs. rsh"
- Reply: Sasha: "Re: ssh .vs. rsh"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|