RE: BatchMode: limit commands, prevent shell?

From: Daniel Ezekiel (Daniel.Ezekiel@ubinetics.co.in)
Date: 01/10/03

  • Next message: nina: "failed password eventhough it is correct"
    From: Daniel Ezekiel <Daniel.Ezekiel@ubinetics.co.in>
    To: 'Mark Hedges' <hedges@ucsd.edu>, secureshell@securityfocus.com
    Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:43:10 +0530
    
    

    u might want to check out on integrating with PAM (Pluggable Authenitcation
    Modules..) Do read the
    HOWTO and associated docs
    Rgds
    Danny

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Mark Hedges [mailto:hedges@ucsd.edu]
    Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:09 AM
    To: secureshell@securityfocus.com
    Subject: BatchMode: limit commands, prevent shell?

    I couldn't find in the archive where anyone talks about using
    BatchMode and if it's possible to limit commands of users coming
    in over pubkey passwordless connections, and if there is a
    better way to prevent login than to put "logout" in .bashrc,
    since this could be clocked out for ^C. Any ideas?
    --mark--

    **********************************************************************
    The information contained in this email and any attachments
    is likely to be confidential and legally privileged, and is for the
    intended recipient named above only. Any copying,
    dissemination, disclosure of or use of this email or its
    attachments unless authorised by us is prohibited, except
    that you may forward this email and/or attachments to a third
    party on a strict "need to know" basis.

    If you have received this email in error, please notify us
    immediately by replying to the email or by calling
    +91-80-2297030. Please then delete this email and any full
    or partial copies of it.

    You as the intended recipient must be aware and accept
    that emailis not a totally secure communications medium.

    Although we have taken all reasonable steps to make
    sure this email and any attachments are free from viruses,
    we do not (to the extent permitted by law) accept any liability
    whatsoever for any virus infection and/or compromise of
    security caused by this email and any attachment.

    No contract may be formed or documents served by you
    on or with us by this email or any attachments unless
    expressly agreed otherwise by us.

    Any views expressed in this email or attachments by
    an individual are not necessarily those of UbiNetics
    India (Private) Limited.

    **********************************************************************



    Relevant Pages

    • Re: System crash
      ... if gdm, gid 42 exists. ... This message, including all attachments, is intended for the ... to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any ... distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: Commercial router
      ... there was a setting that blocked access ... This message, including all attachments, is intended for the ... have received this communication in error, ... to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: Strange Problems/Any way to completely clear out an eTrex Vista?
      ... This email and any attachments may contain confidential material for the ... If you are not the intended recipient, ... Tech support request for eTrex Vista ...
      (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
    • Re: VS: Unzipping problem | write error (disk full?)
      ... the man pages and use the -t flag while extracting as well. ... This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use ... distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. ... to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: System crash
      ... my work machine and I need it back up asap.. ... to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, ... distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. ... message and all its attachments. ...
      (RedHat)