Re: SSH thru HTTP? Sounds backwards.
From: Brian Hatch (security-discuss_at_ifokr.org)
Date: 10/13/03
- Previous message: duane_at_sukkha.info: "Re: SSH thru HTTP? Sounds backwards."
- In reply to: Bernard Hoffman: "SSH thru HTTP? Sounds backwards."
- Next in thread: Michael French: "Re: SSH thru HTTP? Sounds backwards."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:44:20 -0700 To: security-discuss@linuxsecurity.com
> He asked me "is it possible for someone inside my organization to twart
> security by ssh tunneling thru my HTTP proxy server to a destination SSH
> server listening on port 80". I don't know what http proxy he's running and
> we didn't talk about SSL or 443 proxy - I'm assuming the same rules would
> apply.
Either using httptunnel, to make all outbound traffic look like
real HTTP access (requires an httptunnel server on the remote end)
which will go happily through even a application gateway, or by
just running an SSH server on the remote end on port 80 (sshd -p 80)
and connecting to it that way (sssh -p 80 remote host) s.t. it may
be allowed outbound by straight packet filters, etc.
See some pretty pictures at
http://www.ifokr.org/bri/presentations/secureworld-2003/mgp00034.html
-- Brian Hatch "Do you understand Systems and everything you say, sir?" Security Engineer "Yes, if I listen http://www.ifokr.org/bri/ attentively." Every message PGP signed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe email security-discuss-request@linuxsecurity.com
with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: duane_at_sukkha.info: "Re: SSH thru HTTP? Sounds backwards."
- In reply to: Bernard Hoffman: "SSH thru HTTP? Sounds backwards."
- Next in thread: Michael French: "Re: SSH thru HTTP? Sounds backwards."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]