Re: secure by default distros
From: dukun (dukun@trustix.co.id)Date: 09/26/01
- Previous message: dukun: "Re: Secure Linux?"
- In reply to: E. Ratliff: "secure by default distros"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: dukun <dukun@trustix.co.id> To: security-discuss@linuxsecurity.com Subject: Re: secure by default distros Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:09:23 +0700 Message-Id: <01092619092306.04622@spider>
On Wednesday 26 September 2001 03:30, you wrote:
>
> I didn't mean to indicate that Immunix doesn't set secure defaults, I'm
> just not entirely sure that they do. And I do agree with the prevailing
> view on the list that security is almost entirely in the hands of the
> administrator, no matter what the distribution.
if we indentify the whole security problems, the most important thing is the
human and the attitude of the users. Please find the by the RFC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe email security-discuss-request@linuxsecurity.com
with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message.
- Previous message: dukun: "Re: Secure Linux?"
- In reply to: E. Ratliff: "secure by default distros"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]