Re: name servers
From: Hans-Joachim Picht (hans@picht.org)Date: 09/25/01
- Previous message: Hans-Joachim Picht: "Re: Secure Linux?"
- In reply to: Patrick Duane Dunston: "Re: name servers"
- Next in thread: Ryan W. Maple: "Re: name servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:48:03 +0200 From: Hans-Joachim Picht <hans@picht.org> To: security-discuss@linuxsecurity.com Subject: Re: name servers Message-ID: <20010925174803.C1867@picht.org>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:54:16AM -0400, Patrick Duane Dunston wrote:
> djbdns is very secure and has no significant security history.
But it comes along with an ugly license. See the authors homepage for
details http://cr.yp.to .
Some dns admins dont like djbdns because it's not as flexible as bind 9.
Here is a talk which mentions these aspects:
ftp://ftp.shub-internet.org:/pub/shub/brad/papers/*LBW2001*
-- With best regards Hans - Joachim Picht <hans@picht.org>------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe email security-discuss-request@linuxsecurity.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message.
- Previous message: Hans-Joachim Picht: "Re: Secure Linux?"
- In reply to: Patrick Duane Dunston: "Re: name servers"
- Next in thread: Ryan W. Maple: "Re: name servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]