[VulnWatch] Corsaire Security Advisory - Multiple vendor MIME RFC822 comment issue

From: advisories (advisories_at_corsaire.com)
Date: 09/13/04

  • Next message: Richie B.: "[VulnWatch] UNIRAS ALERT - 34/04 - Vulnerability Issues with Apache 2.0.x"
    To: <advisories@corsaire.com>
    Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:49:59 +0100
    
    

    -- Corsaire Security Advisory --

    Title: Multiple vendor MIME RFC822 comment issue
    Date: 04.08.03
    Application: various
    Environment: various
    Author: Martin O'Neal [martin.oneal@corsaire.com]
    Audience: General distribution
    Reference: c030804-009

    -- Scope --

    The aim of this document is to clearly define a MIME content evasion
    issue that affects a variety of products including; browsers, proxy
    servers, email clients, content security gateways and antivirus
    products.

    -- History --

    Discovered: 04.08.03 (Martin O'Neal)
    NISCC notified: 19.02.04
    Document released: 13.09.04

    -- Overview --

    There are a number of content security gateway and antivirus products
    available that provide policy based security functionality. Part of this
    functionality allows the products to block embedded file attachments
    based on their specific content type, such as executables or those
    containing viruses. However, by using malformed MIME encapsulation
    techniques centred on the presence of fields containing an RFC822
    comment, this functionality can be evaded.

    -- Analysis --

    The MIME standards are intended to provide a common mechanism to
    exchange data between systems and are used extensively by protocols such
    as HTTP and SMTP. The structure of a MIME message is defined in RFC2045
    [1], which in turn makes use of concepts introduced in RFC822 [2]
    (superseded by RFC2822 [3]).

    The standards define a range of fields that control how data is encoded
    within the transport, and how it should be interpreted by the receiving
    agent. RFC822 [2] states "A comment is a set of ASCII characters, which
    is enclosed in matching parentheses and which is not within a quoted-
    string. The comment construct permits message originators to add text
    which will be useful for human readers, but which will be ignored by the
    formal semantics. Comments should be retained while the message is
    subject to interpretation according to this standard. However, comments
    must NOT be included in other cases, such as during protocol exchanges
    with mail servers".

    The implementation of the commenting standard has not been universal by
    all of the vendors. For many products, such as email clients and
    browsers, this scope for variation might only result in some unreliable
    behaviour. However, for a collection of security products, being unaware
    of the various ways that the standard has been implemented can lead to
    more serious results, as the products may fail to detect a threat within
    the data stream.

    When a receiving agent is presented with a MIME message that contains an
    unexpected RFC822 comment, it tends to respond in one of three broad
    ways:

    - It identifies the MIME message as malformed and blocks it.
    - It fails to interpret the MIME field (or message).
    - It correctly interprets the MIME field (or message).

    The first of the three would be the correct behaviour for a security
    conscious product, but based on empirical research this is not the
    common result for a number of scenarios.

    The RFC822 comment issue has been observed to affect many of the
    security products. To use this issue as an attack vector, all that is
    required is to identify a target that has a client agent that
    successfully interprets the RFC822 comment correctly, where any security
    products that protect it do not.

    -- Recommendations --

    To be effective tools, the security products must not only be able to
    process encoding techniques implemented as per the relevant standard,
    but also common misinterpretations and deliberate corruptions.

    As an ongoing process, a study project should be undertaken by the
    vendors to identify applications that routinely decode MIME objects and
    have a liberal interpretation of the MIME standard.

    NISCC have produced a document consolidating a number of vendor
    statements on these issues [4]. Contact your vendor directly to
    establish whether you are affected by these issues.

    -- Background --

    This issue was discovered using a custom SMTP/HTTP vulnerability
    analysis tool developed by Corsaire's security assessment team. This
    tool is not available publicly, but is an example of the specialist
    approach used by Corsaire's consultants as part of a commercial security
    assessment. To find out more about the cutting edge services provided by
    Corsaire simply visit our web site at http://www.corsaire.com

    -- CVE --

    The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) project has assigned
    the name CAN-2004-0162 to this issue. This is a candidate for
    inclusion in the CVE list (http://cve.mitre.org), which standardises
    names for security problems.

    -- References --

    [1] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html
    [2] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html
    [3] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html
    [4] http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/380375/mime.htm

    -- Revision --

    a. Initial release.
    b. Added CVE reference.
    c. Released.

    -- Distribution --

    This security advisory may be freely distributed, provided that it
    remains unaltered and in its original form.

    -- Disclaimer --

    The information contained within this advisory is supplied "as-is" with
    no warranties or guarantees of fitness of use or otherwise. Corsaire
    accepts no responsibility for any damage caused by the use or misuse of
    this information.

    -- About Corsaire --

    Corsaire are a leading information security consultancy, founded in 1997
    in Guildford, Surrey, UK. Corsaire bring innovation, integrity and
    analytical rigour to every job, which means fast and dramatic security
    performance improvements. Our services centre on the delivery of
    information security planning, assessment, implementation, management
    and vulnerability research.

    A free guide to selecting a security assessment supplier is available at
    http://www.penetration-testing.com

    Copyright 2003 Corsaire Limited. All rights reserved.


  • Next message: Richie B.: "[VulnWatch] UNIRAS ALERT - 34/04 - Vulnerability Issues with Apache 2.0.x"

    Relevant Pages