[NEWS] The Slammer Worm Effect: Why Linux OS is More Attackable than Windows OS
From: SecuriTeam (support_at_securiteam.com)
To: firstname.lastname@example.org Date: 9 Jun 2003 18:34:06 +0200
The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com
- - promotion
Latest attack techniques.
You're a pen tester, but is google.com still your R&D team?
Now you can get trustworthy commercial-grade exploits and the latest
techniques from a world-class research group.
Learn more at http://www.coresecurity.com/promos/sit_e1,
or call 617-399-6980
- - - - - - - - -
The Slammer Worm Effect: Why Linux OS is More Attackable than Windows OS
A very interesting analysis of the amount of attacked hosts (Linux vs.
Windows) has been created by Zone-H. It shows that taking into account
such worms as Slammer, reveals that Linux is currently the most attacked
host on the Internet.
The news appeared during the last days in which London based MI2G.com
stated that Linux OS is now more attacked then Windows has been reported
by media and immediately criticized by the IT Security world.
MI2G is basing part of their research job relying on Zone-H.org databases
therefore they based their last press release using the data Zone-H is
sending to all its mail subscribers regarding the daily attacks.
Using such data MI2G was calculating that the amount of Linux attacks has
stably overcome the Windows attacks.
The direct result of Zone-H data organized in a chart graphically
supporting MI2G statement is in fact showing that today Linux attacks are
as 5 times higher than the Windows ones.
The IT Security world has immediately attacked MI2G statement saying that
when counting the attacks MI2G accounted all the mass-defacement (an
attack that while hitting a single IP or host, generates multiple
defacements like it usually happens to big hosting companies) as single
The Itsec purists argued that the mass-defacements should be accounted
instead as 1 single hit therefore MI2G statement was either premature or
The only organization that has enough authority to solve the dilemma is
Zone-H as today is holding the most complete database having access to
Therefore, today Zone-H staff started to dig in the archives filtering out
all attacks by SINGLE IP divided into the different OSs.
The results that came out is clear: Linux is in effect the most attacked
Operative System, and this already since middle March 2003 as you can
check by this graph:
The graph is showing the attacks trend during the last 16 moths.
The graph shows clearly that one of the most hit OS over the time was
Windows (red line). The interesting fact is that since middle-January 2003
Windows became for some unknown reasons less attacked (and less
attackable) than Linux.
Zone-H identified the reason of this strange phenomenon in what Zone-H
calls the "Slammerworm effect".
In fact, the Slammer worm ha produced since December 2002 a spike in the
Windows 2000 statistics. Since then, the Slammer worm threat has been so
much covered by the media that companies started to patch at a speed never
seen before. The result of this process is that Windows OS has instantly
become less attractive for crackers.
If we also consider that the number of the worldwide Windows installations
is presumably higher than the Linux installation it means that a properly
weighted analysis would reveal that the Linux "hacker attractiveness"
would be even clearer.
The graph generated from Zone-H databases is also showing other
interesting aspects: the web cracking phenomenon is transforming more and
more into a social problem very much related to political issues.
The September 11th anniversary and the Iraq war have been the reason why
the overall number of attacks has increased 500%, hitting this year an
amount of targets never seen before.
If anybody before was under evaluating the web-cracking events, these
graphs and numbers should be the reason of paying more attention to these
facts as they are more and more configuring a sociologic problem.
This bulletin is sent to members of the SecuriTeam mailing list.
To unsubscribe from the list, send mail with an empty subject line and body to: email@example.com
In order to subscribe to the mailing list, simply forward this email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
The information in this bulletin is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind.
In no event shall we be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages.