[NT] Buffer Overflow in Internet Explorer's HTTP Parsing Code

support_at_securiteam.com
Date: 04/27/03

  • Next message: support_at_securiteam.com: "[EXPL] Snort TCP Stream Reassembly Integer Overflow Exploit"
    To: list@securiteam.com
    Date: 27 Apr 2003 21:35:00 +0200
    
    

    The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com
    - - promotion

    In the US?

    Contact Beyond Security at our new California office
    housewarming rates on automated network vulnerability
    scanning. We also welcome ISPs and other resellers!

    Please contact us at: 323-882-8286 or ussales@beyondsecurity.com
    - - - - - - - - -

      Buffer Overflow in Internet Explorer's HTTP Parsing Code
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SUMMARY

    The code used in Microsoft Internet Explorer to parse web servers' HTTP
    replies contains a buffer overflow vulnerability. Specifically the faulty
    code is located in URLMON.DLL. A malicious user may exploit this
    vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on an IE user's system.

    DETAILS

    HTTP is the protocol used in communication between web servers and web
    browsers. When a web page is viewed, the browser sends a HTTP request to
    the server in question. The server then sends a HTTP reply that usually
    contains the web page the browser requested. In addition to the document
    body that is shown to the user, the HTTP reply contains some header fields
    that e.g. specify how the document should be presented to the user.

    Due to missing or insufficient input validation, a buffer overflow takes
    place in Internet Explorer when it receives a HTTP reply with excessively
    long values in certain header fields. A buffer placed on stack is overrun
    and a malicious reply may overwrite data, including the subroutine's
    return address, and thus direct the program execution to an arbitrary
    address. The vulnerability is a traditional stack-based buffer overflow
    and relatively easy to exploit.

    This vulnerability can be used by an attacker to run any code in the
    system of the victim viewing a special web page with Internet Explorer or
    reading mail with Outlook or Outlook Express. More details will be
    published later.

    Solution:
    The vendor was informed about the bug on March 16, 2003. Microsoft has
    classified this vulnerability as critical and published a bulletin and
    patch correcting the issue. These are available at
    <http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-015.asp>
    http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-015.asp

    The information in the "Mitigating factors" section of Microsoft's
    bulletin claiming that this vulnerability is not exploitable by e-mail
    borne attacks is incorrect. Test exploits have been produced for WWW,
    Outlook, and Outlook Express attack scenarios. In each of the cases, the
    exploit code runs without further user interaction on the victim system.
    Furthermore, no e-mail attachments or any kind of scripting are needed
    since the attack can be carried out via a standard HTML. In fact, merely
    starting the e-mail program can lead to exploitation because (depending on
    configuration) it may automatically open the first new message.

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    The information has been provided by <mailto:jouko@solutions.fi> Jouko
    Pynnonen.

    ========================================

    This bulletin is sent to members of the SecuriTeam mailing list.
    To unsubscribe from the list, send mail with an empty subject line and body to: list-unsubscribe@securiteam.com
    In order to subscribe to the mailing list, simply forward this email to: list-subscribe@securiteam.com

    ====================
    ====================

    DISCLAIMER:
    The information in this bulletin is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind.
    In no event shall we be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages.


  • Next message: support_at_securiteam.com: "[EXPL] Snort TCP Stream Reassembly Integer Overflow Exploit"

    Relevant Pages