[REVS] Exploring Host Discovery Using NMap
From: support@securiteam.com
Date: 11/24/02
- Previous message: support@securiteam.com: "[TOOL] Mapper, Multi Packet Type Network Connectivity Tester"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: support@securiteam.com To: list@securiteam.com Date: 24 Nov 2002 08:57:07 +0200
The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com
- - promotion
Beyond Security would like to welcome Tiscali World Online
to our service provider team.
For more info on their service offering IP-Secure,
please visit http://www.worldonline.co.za/services/work_ip.asp
- - - - - - - - -
Exploring Host Discovery Using NMap
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY
The following whitepaper explores some methods for host discovery, paying
the most attention to discovering hosts behind a firewall with an explicit
policy. The whitepaper itself doesn't provide new information, however it
does a great job in explaining the basics of NMap usage, and how it can be
leveraged to provide even better results.
DETAILS
Introduction:
As a Computer Security Engineer that regularly conducts external
penetration tests, a recurring challenge seems to arise when assessing
organizations with a large allocation of IP address space. What does one
do when faced with multiple class B's, a few class C's, and a limited
amount of time? Do you stick all of the address space in your favorite
scanner and hit the Go button, wait till it's done and hope the results
are accurate? How can you be sure that your scanner found all the hosts
that are accessible? Do you even know the method your scanner uses to
discover which hosts are alive?
This document attempts to answer the above questions, and will illustrate
(at a very technical level) the methodology that Mark uses to accurately
discover which hosts are accessible prior to conducting port scanning or a
vulnerability assessment.
Note: Some may say that unless one performs a scan on all 65535 TCP and
UDP ports on every possible IP address in the range, that the penetration
tester isn't being thorough enough. While Mark does agree that in order to
be completely thorough, one must perform a scan as stated, but Mark has
rarely, if ever had the luxury of performing such a scan, as it usually
takes a considerable amount of time. An underlying theme about Information
Security is about striking a balance and weighing the pros and cons. If
being absolutely thorough and time is of no consideration, you'll more
than likely want to run a full, blind scan on all IP addresses. If
however, a balance can be struck between being thorough and completing the
project on time, read on - you may learn some techniques to improve both
the accuracy and efficiency of your scans.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The complete whitepaper can be downloaded by going to:
<http://moonpie.org/writings/discovery.pdf>
http://moonpie.org/writings/discovery.pdf
The tool used by the whitepaper can be downloaded from:
<http://moonpie.org/tools/discover.tgz>
http://moonpie.org/tools/discover.tgz
The information has been provided by <mailto:moonpie@moonpie.org> Mark
Wolfgang.
========================================
This bulletin is sent to members of the SecuriTeam mailing list.
To unsubscribe from the list, send mail with an empty subject line and body to: list-unsubscribe@securiteam.com
In order to subscribe to the mailing list, simply forward this email to: list-subscribe@securiteam.com
====================
====================
DISCLAIMER:
The information in this bulletin is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind.
In no event shall we be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages.
- Next message: support@securiteam.com: "[UNIX] XSS in PostNuke Rogue"
- Previous message: support@securiteam.com: "[TOOL] Mapper, Multi Packet Type Network Connectivity Tester"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: 0x80072EE7
... Point the DNS Resolution to 4.2.2.2 ... Is the Windows firewall sufficient
to replace Norton AV and Counterspy? ... I have Norton Antivirus and Online Security. ...
When I looked in the Hosts file as suggested in one resolution, ... (microsoft.public.windowsupdate) - Re: 0x80072EE7
... Is the Windows firewall sufficient to replace Norton AV and Counterspy? ...
I have Norton Antivirus and Online Security. ... When I looked in the Hosts file
as suggested in one resolution, ... could just be a suggestion for a possible explanation
for the problem ... (microsoft.public.windowsupdate) - Re: Create restricted user account, 2003 server AD domain
... I originally created the security group 'def' as a domain local group. ...
Note that user 'abc' is NOT listed as a member of the domain local group ... I verified
this on both the domain server and the XP hosts ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.security) - Re: 0x80072EE7
... this problem with updating Microsoft. ... I have Norton Antivirus and Online
Security. ... When I looked in the Hosts file as suggested in one resolution, ...
could just be a suggestion for a possible explanation for the problem ... (microsoft.public.windowsupdate) - RE: Testing load balanced servers behind NAT
... I'm not firewall expert, but you could use FIREWALKING(a traceroute-like ...
free* solution in network security, ... is there any other documentation on identifying
hosts behind ... accessible to the Internet. ... (Pen-Test)