[UNIX] Vulnerabilities Found in ScponlyFrom: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Previous message: email@example.com: "[UNIX] Another Buffer Overflow Found in PostgreSQL (repeat function)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: firstname.lastname@example.org To: email@example.com Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:55:45 +0200 (CEST)
The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com
- - promotion
When was the last time you checked your server's security?
How about a monthly report?
http://www.AutomatedScanning.com - Know that you're safe.
- - - - - - - - -
Vulnerabilities Found in Scponly
<http://www.sublimation.org/scponly/> Scponly is an alternative 'shell'
(of sorts) for system administrators who would like to provide access to
remote users to both read and write local files without providing any
remote execution privileges. Functionally, it is best described as a
wrapper to the "tried and true" SSH suite of applications. A vulnerability
in the product allows circumvention of access limitations through user's
SSHd environment files.
Scponly makes no effort to verify the path to the scp or sftp-server
executables before it executes them, and uses system() to do so.
If the server administrator makes no effort to restrict access to the
user's .ssh directory, the user can upload a file with a custom
environment to $HOME/.ssh/environment. Subsequently a user can upload a
script or program to run arbitrary commands so that they change their
login shell, or what have you.
For example, the user could scp the following to $HOME/.ssh/environment:
# ssh environment
Subsequently, the user could upload the following file to their home
directory, and call it scp:
echo "I'm a bad boy" > /tmp/exploit
When they next scp a file:
# ls -l
-rw-r--r-- 1 bonehead bonehead 14 Aug 19 22:46 exploit
# cat exploit
I'm a bad boy
Provided they are careful about output of their command, with the above
script, the file still is copied and anyone watching over their shoulder
is none the wiser. Obviously, this could be replaced with any arbitrary
command. This provides the user with a means of running arbitrary commands
by simply uploading a file. Another neat trick is:
echo "mypassword" | chsh -s /bin/bash
Now the user can log in with SSH, assuming chsh allows users to change
their own shells.
Additionally, some versions of the OpenSSH sshd(8) man page claim that at
start-up, SSHd will execute commands in $HOME/.ssh/rc using /bin/sh,
rather than with the user's shell as listed in /etc/passwd. The man page
on Derek's system says this, even though in practice the version of SSHd
Derek has installed actually does use the user's shell. However, if this
is *NOT* the case, the user could execute arbitrary commands by uploading
a file to $HOME/.ssh/rc.
Finally, though effort is made to remove shell meta-characters from the
input, scponly uses system() to execute commands. Therefore, wildcards are
possible. In some environments, it may be possible to exploit this
There are several possible ways to "fix" these problems, some perhaps
better than others.
1. Limit the user's ability to affect their environment
The first is more a workaround than a solution, but should be effective.
This is the route the author has chosen to go, for the moment, while he
works on other fixes. The ability of the user to circumvent scponly is
dependent upon their ability to manipulate their environment, by uploading
files to specific locations in their .ssh directory.
The system administrator can prevent this by making the user's home
directory non-writable to the user. In order to provide file upload to the
user, a user-writable directory must be provided for that purpose.
Some may feel this is too restrictive; some may feel that creating .ssh/
and making it non-writeable to the user is sufficient. It is not. If the
user has write access to their home directory, the user can log in via
sftp, and simply remove the .ssh directory if it is empty, or rename it if
it is not, regardless of who owns it or what its permissions are. The only
way to prevent them from doing this is to make their home directory
This will prevent the user from being able to modify their environment
files, preventing the exploit.
Depending on how the call to system() can be exploited, if it can be at
all, this may or may not solve that problem.
The author's update involves documenting the problem, and updating the
installation to include some chown commands. The author does intend to
remove the call to system() in the immediate future; but with no threat of
a known exploit which was not fixable in doing the above, was not
concerned that Derek wait to release this vulnerability before having the
opportunity to do so.
2. Fix the code
These problems can be eliminated by forcing the use of the "correct" path
for the scp or sftp-server binaries on the restricted host, and by using
execv() to execute the programs. The correct paths can be either provided
by configuration file, or compiled in. Eliminating the reliance on the
user's environment prevents them from being able to make modifications
that affect the program.
Incidentally, Derek became aware of the vulnerabilities in scponly after
having written his own program, called rssh, to do essentially the same
thing. Derek took this approach. Unfortunately, if SSHd on the system in
question does in fact use /bin/sh to execute programs in $HOME/.ssh/rc,
there's not much you can do programmatically, and the workaround in part 1
must be used. Derek note this in the manpage for rssh. The limitation is
that by the time scponly (or rssh) runs, SSHd has already allowed the user
to execute commands.
3. "Fix" SSHd
While not technically broken, it surprises Derek that there is no option
in OpenSSH's SSHd to ignore user environment variables, especially since
they do have options to ignore other user files (specifically .rhosts and
ssh/known_hosts). Used in conjunction with such an option, all of the
problems above would be eliminated. For this sort of functionality, the
combination of 2 and 3 is probably the ideal solution.
The information has been provided by <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> Derek D.
This bulletin is sent to members of the SecuriTeam mailing list.
To unsubscribe from the list, send mail with an empty subject line and body to: email@example.com
In order to subscribe to the mailing list, simply forward this email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
The information in this bulletin is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind.
In no event shall we be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages.