[NEWS] Security Problem Found with Cisco UBR900 Series Routers
From: support@securiteam.comDate: 01/04/02
- Previous message: support@securiteam.com: "[EXPL] UPNP Exploit Code Released"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: support@securiteam.com To: list@securiteam.com Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:27:46 +0100 (CET)
The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com
- - promotion
When was the last time you checked your server's security?
How about a monthly report?
http://www.AutomatedScanning.com - Know that you're safe.
- - - - - - - - -
Security Problem Found with Cisco UBR900 Series Routers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY
A security vulnerability in Cisco's UBR900 allows read-write access to the
MIB, which leads to access to the router configuration, using any
community name whatsoever.
DETAILS
Vulnerable systems:
UBR920
UBR924
UBR925
Vendor response:
Cisco PSIRT was contacted, and a local cable provider, where it was
determined that this provider definitely uses the same make and model of
routers. The cable company responded only to the second part of the
message, which was a request for prices of business-grade cable service.
The response from Cisco was as follows:
This behavior in SNMP access is due to DOCSIS 1.0 standards that specifies
that by default, there is no restrictions on SNMP access to the device.
Cisco has to comply with DOCSIS standards in order to produce a CableLabs
certified product. Cisco has tried very hard to convince CableLabs that
their approach is wrong, but have had no success. CableLabs standards
provides a mechanism (via a DOCSIS configuration file) to automatically
configure SNMP access list as the device attaches to the network. It is
assumed (by CableLabs) that prior to this time, security is not critical
since the device gets its configuration (via the DOCSIS configuration
file) before anyone can do any harm.
The document is TP-OSSI-ATPv1.1-I01-011221. The specific is on 2.1.7 CM
Network management Access and SNMP Co-existence (OSS-07.1), 1 Default
Access. It is on page OSS-7.1 page 3 of 11.
It states "The Default Access test verifies the CM agent supports full
SNMP access from an NSI side NMS and from a CPE side NMS after the CM
completes registration with the basic1.cfg configuration file. The term
"Default Access" implies no docsDevNmAccessTable row and no SNMPv3
configuration was supplied to the CM. Any SNMP read and any SNMP write
community string can be used for this test, since compliant CMs will allow
open access in the Default Access condition."
This document is available from CableLabs at <http://www.cablemodem.com/>
http://www.cablemodem.com/.
The docsis spec has explicit requirements about the implementation and it
modifies what is mentioned in RFC2669. It is also explicitly stated that
it overrides the RFC should any conflict arises. Cisco's implementation
has been certified by CableLabs multiple times.
Once CableLabs changes its requirement, Cisco would make the modifications
to its products.
Workaround:
Possible workaround would be to create a specific RW community name, and
make it accessible only from a machine on the internal network, or to stop
using SNMPv1 altogether, or not to use SNMP at all.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The information has been provided by <mailto:secureks2002@yahoo.com>
Scott.
========================================
This bulletin is sent to members of the SecuriTeam mailing list.
To unsubscribe from the list, send mail with an empty subject line and body to: list-unsubscribe@securiteam.com
In order to subscribe to the mailing list, simply forward this email to: list-subscribe@securiteam.com
====================
====================
DISCLAIMER:
The information in this bulletin is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind.
In no event shall we be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages.
- Previous message: support@securiteam.com: "[EXPL] UPNP Exploit Code Released"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
- Solaris Security Summary
... Administering Security on the Solaris OE ... Configuration control,
facility management, and system ... Authentication: The ability to prove who you are. ...
(comp.unix.solaris) - Re: DCOM calls fails - access denied
... That's exactly how I understood the ASP.NET security. ... But why does one configuration
work but not the other? ... should get the token from IIS. ... If you set there
a domain account, ... (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.security) - [TOOL] LogAgent, ASCII Log Monitor
... The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be
found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com ... LogAgent tries to fill that gap
by monitoring the log files on ... for network-wide log file centralization. ...
# This program gets its configuration from the file config.txt, ... (Securiteam) - Re: Wireless Access Point on external router?
... The security configuration Owen has documented uses WPA2, ... it will work automatically
for any wireless client PC that you ... switch to RWW and stop caring about VPN).
... (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) - RE: [Full-Disclosure] Name One Web Site Compromised by Download.Ject?
... look at their security and have clauses in the contracts indicating what can ...
configuration was IT Director with a few analysts reporting through CFO. ... in stupid
things or under stupid management they don't have the time to put ... The 17 year old hackers
have all of the time in ... (Full-Disclosure)