Re: Bug in server 2003 DNS policy setting
From: David Adner (davidadner_at_YAHOO.COM)
Date: 05/18/05
- Previous message: Russ: "Re: Recovery Console Post SP1"
- In reply to: Tommaso Calosi - SYSMIC SRL: "Bug in server 2003 DNS policy setting"
- Next in thread: Jeremy Brooks: "Re: Bug in server 2003 DNS policy setting"
- Reply: Jeremy Brooks: "Re: Bug in server 2003 DNS policy setting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 14:55:00 -0500 To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
IPCONFIG reads from the traditional portion of the Registry where TCP/IP
settings are stored. The GPO setting you're referring to will store the
info in a different location. So this isn't a "bug" but simply the function
of how IPCONFIG works. It's always behaved this way; it's nothing specific
to 2003 SP1 or XP SP2. It won't be changed unless a sufficient number of
customers complain.
Someone else mentioned the DNS Search Suffix Lists also showing this
behavior when viewed via IPCONFIG. This is for the same reason as above.
> Enviroment:
> Server: Windows server 2003 Domain.SP1
> Clients: XP Pro SP2
>
> Symptoms:
> In group policy you can set up a setting under computer
> configuration > Administrative templates > Network > DNS
> client > DNS servers so that the computers the policy is
> applied to will be configured with the specified dns servers.
> When the policy is applied, you run ipconfig /all on the
> client and you will be displayed the original ( before the
> policy was applied ) DNS configuration however when you run
> nslookup the DNS server used is the one defined in the
> policy. Therefore the DNS displayed in the configuration is
> different from the one used for name resolution.
-- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for your AV, or at least that the idea is considered. --
- Previous message: Russ: "Re: Recovery Console Post SP1"
- In reply to: Tommaso Calosi - SYSMIC SRL: "Bug in server 2003 DNS policy setting"
- Next in thread: Jeremy Brooks: "Re: Bug in server 2003 DNS policy setting"
- Reply: Jeremy Brooks: "Re: Bug in server 2003 DNS policy setting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|