Re: MS Updates SP1 for Windows Server 2003

• Previous message: James D. Stallard: "Re: Bug in server 2003 DNS policy setting"
• Maybe in reply to: Joe Dance: "MS Updates SP1 for Windows Server 2003"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Date:         Tue, 17 May 2005 12:32:08 -0700
To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM

Hi Joe:

Neither of these packages have changed or been updated.

For Windows Server 2003 SP1, we are releasing additional languages as
they become available. This is what you are seeing on SUS servers. The
most recent update should have been 5/10.

For KB811630, the detection was updated on 4/26 to prevent it from being
offered to Windows Server 2003 SP1 machines. The file itself has not
been changed.

You can look at the log of SUS changes on
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/894199 - this KB is updated whenever SUS
updates, including detection, are published, so you can find out what
has changed.

Hope this link to the KB article is useful in the future for these types
of updates.

-jg

-----Original Message-----
From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
[mailto:NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM] On Behalf Of Joe Dance
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 1:01 PM
To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
Subject: MS Updates SP1 for Windows Server 2003

Microsoft today released, via Software Update Services, an updated
version
of SP1 for Window Server 2003, as well as an updated version of Q811630,
which applies to W2k SP2 and SP3.

Joe Dance
University of South Carolina

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
--
NTBugtraq Editor's Note:
Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an
Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of
a message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good.
Someone who did not actually send you a virus may receive the
notification and scramble their support staff to find an infection which
never existed in the first place. Suggest such notifications be disabled
by whomever is responsible for your AV, or at least that the idea is
considered.
--
--
NTBugtraq Editor's Note:
Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for your AV, or at least that the idea is considered.
--

• Previous message: James D. Stallard: "Re: Bug in server 2003 DNS policy setting"
• Maybe in reply to: Joe Dance: "MS Updates SP1 for Windows Server 2003"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]