autorun problems after installing latest MS patches ms05-016 to -022 on Win2k server
From: ntbugtrack (ntbugtrack_at_APOLLOLIFESCIENCES.COM)
Date: 04/13/05
- Previous message: Robin Keir: "MS05-019 breaks TCP raw socket sends"
- Next in thread: Dave Korn: "Re: autorun problems after installing latest MS patches ms05-016 to -022 on Win2k server"
- Reply: Dave Korn: "Re: autorun problems after installing latest MS patches ms05-016 to -022 on Win2k server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:31:13 +1000 To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing the same problems or has
some ideas what is going on.
After having installed manually the latest swag of MS patches ms05-016
to -022 on a Win2k server all seemed fine at first. I re-booted as
necessary, all normal. I then logged in as an ordinary Domain user and
was surprised that network drive mapping did not work nor had any of the
autostart processes started - including the AVG antivirus on-acccess
scanner. From a quick inspection with Sysinternals Autoruns (V6.0) I
quickly determined that all entries in
\Documents and Settings\ordinaryDomainUserMrX\Start Menu\Programs\Startup\
HKLM\Software\Microsoft\WindowsNT\CurrentVersion\Run
(and possibly others)
were not executed but the registry seemed intact. (Why the hack were
they not ececuted - the registry entries all seem fine?). Not affected
are software that run as services, such as a Kerio software firewall.
Strange thing - if I login as Domain Admin, the same processes that were
not autostarted for the ordinary user, now all started as expected....
Logging off & logging in as Mr Ordinary again left the Antivirus and
other autostarts dead again. Also I have ruled out the Kerio firewall as
being a possible cause.
I have not tested this behaviour on a W2k workstation yet.
Anyone any good ideas?
Thanks,
Arndt
-- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for your AV, or at least that the idea is considered. --
- Previous message: Robin Keir: "MS05-019 breaks TCP raw socket sends"
- Next in thread: Dave Korn: "Re: autorun problems after installing latest MS patches ms05-016 to -022 on Win2k server"
- Reply: Dave Korn: "Re: autorun problems after installing latest MS patches ms05-016 to -022 on Win2k server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]