Multiple High Risk flaws fixed in Oracle
From: NGSSoftware Insight Security Research (nisr_at_NEXTGENSS.COM)
Date: 04/13/05
- Previous message: Peter McNab: "Re: Re Tues 12th MS Updates. Microsoft Security Bulletins"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 02:09:05 +0100 To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
David Litchfield of NGSSoftware has discovered multiple high risk
vulnerabilities in Oracle's Database Server. Versions affected include
Oracle Database 10g Release 1 Version 10.1.0.2, 10.1.0.3, 10.1.0.3.1 and
10.1.0.4
Oracle9i Database Server Release 2, versions 9.2.0.5 and 9.2.0.6
Oracle9i Database Server Release 1, versions 9.0.1.4, 9.0.1.5 and 9.0.4
Oracle8i Database Server Release 3, version 8.1.7.4
Oracle has released a patch that addresses these issues. The announcement of
this patch can be found here:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/pdf/cpuapr2005.pdf
Patches can be downloaded from the Metalink website -
http://metalink.oracle.com/.
NGSSoftware are going to withhold details about these flaws for three
months. Full details will be published on the Tuesday, 12th of July 2005.
This three month window will allow Oracle database administrators the time
needed to test and apply the patch set before the details are released to
the general public. This reflects NGSSoftware's new approach to responsible
disclosure.
NGSSQuirreL for Oracle, NGSSoftware's advanced vulnerability assessment
scanner and security manager for Oracle, has been updated to check for and
positively identify these flaws in Oracle database servers on the network.
More information about NGSSQuirreL for Oracle can be found at
http://www.ngssoftware.com/squirrelora.htm.
NGSSoftware Insight Security Research
http://www.ngssoftware.com/
+44(0)208 401 0070
-- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for your AV, or at least that the idea is considered. --
- Previous message: Peter McNab: "Re: Re Tues 12th MS Updates. Microsoft Security Bulletins"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|